▲ 336 ▼ Sony’s TV business is being taken over by TCL (www.theverge.com) submitted 8 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 132 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] REDACTED@infosec.pub -12 points 8 months ago (7 children) TV 2026 Honestly, don't remember the last time I watched TV permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Do you think the only thing TVs are used for is watching traditional terrestrial TV? Lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 2 points 8 months ago I only watch extraterrestrial TV. permalink fedilink source parent [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -1 points 8 months ago* (2 children) It's the main purpose of them, yes. Define TV to me. I don't see the point of paying for decoders, smart TV and bunch of other things I'll never use, much smarter decision is to buy a monitor which focuses on image quality and performance, far more suitable for consoles, Roku, etc. Commenter above low-key described that OLED as a monitor more than a TV permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child) TVs are fantastic monitors. It sounds reasonable to not want to pay for basically a small computer inside the TV. But in practice, its not that expensive of a component. And TV volumes are so high that they're bigger and cheaper and higher quality than an equivalently priced monitor, anyway. Hence, while I'm fine with the monitors I have, I'm never buying a "monitor" again. It just makes no financial sense when I can get a 40" 4K TV with 120hz VRR instead, that happens to work fantastically as a streaming box too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 point 7 months ago* My experience is that they all look terrible up close, for whatever reason. TVs are essentially designed for further-back viewing permalink fedilink source parent [+] whitecollarcry@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 point 8 months ago Well, the top killer is Boost, which is a client for Lemmy, sitting at 1/3 battery usage. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (4 children) Do you think the only thing TVs are used for is watching traditional terrestrial TV? Lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 2 points 8 months ago I only watch extraterrestrial TV. permalink fedilink source parent [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -1 points 8 months ago* (2 children) It's the main purpose of them, yes. Define TV to me. I don't see the point of paying for decoders, smart TV and bunch of other things I'll never use, much smarter decision is to buy a monitor which focuses on image quality and performance, far more suitable for consoles, Roku, etc. Commenter above low-key described that OLED as a monitor more than a TV permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child) TVs are fantastic monitors. It sounds reasonable to not want to pay for basically a small computer inside the TV. But in practice, its not that expensive of a component. And TV volumes are so high that they're bigger and cheaper and higher quality than an equivalently priced monitor, anyway. Hence, while I'm fine with the monitors I have, I'm never buying a "monitor" again. It just makes no financial sense when I can get a 40" 4K TV with 120hz VRR instead, that happens to work fantastically as a streaming box too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 point 7 months ago* My experience is that they all look terrible up close, for whatever reason. TVs are essentially designed for further-back viewing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 2 points 8 months ago I only watch extraterrestrial TV. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -1 points 8 months ago* (2 children) It's the main purpose of them, yes. Define TV to me. I don't see the point of paying for decoders, smart TV and bunch of other things I'll never use, much smarter decision is to buy a monitor which focuses on image quality and performance, far more suitable for consoles, Roku, etc. Commenter above low-key described that OLED as a monitor more than a TV permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child) TVs are fantastic monitors. It sounds reasonable to not want to pay for basically a small computer inside the TV. But in practice, its not that expensive of a component. And TV volumes are so high that they're bigger and cheaper and higher quality than an equivalently priced monitor, anyway. Hence, while I'm fine with the monitors I have, I'm never buying a "monitor" again. It just makes no financial sense when I can get a 40" 4K TV with 120hz VRR instead, that happens to work fantastically as a streaming box too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 point 7 months ago* My experience is that they all look terrible up close, for whatever reason. TVs are essentially designed for further-back viewing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child) TVs are fantastic monitors. It sounds reasonable to not want to pay for basically a small computer inside the TV. But in practice, its not that expensive of a component. And TV volumes are so high that they're bigger and cheaper and higher quality than an equivalently priced monitor, anyway. Hence, while I'm fine with the monitors I have, I'm never buying a "monitor" again. It just makes no financial sense when I can get a 40" 4K TV with 120hz VRR instead, that happens to work fantastically as a streaming box too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 point 7 months ago* My experience is that they all look terrible up close, for whatever reason. TVs are essentially designed for further-back viewing permalink fedilink source parent
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 point 7 months ago* My experience is that they all look terrible up close, for whatever reason. TVs are essentially designed for further-back viewing permalink fedilink source parent
[+] whitecollarcry@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 point 8 months ago Well, the top killer is Boost, which is a client for Lemmy, sitting at 1/3 battery usage. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 point 8 months ago Well, the top killer is Boost, which is a client for Lemmy, sitting at 1/3 battery usage. permalink fedilink source parent