moopet comments on Work in the office or not at all

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)

Not trying to be facetious, but that's a bit like saying, "people are dying in car accidents so would you rather the cars come with heated seats or cigarette lighters?" It doesn't matter what is or isn't happening, it's not connected to anything else in this thread.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

I think you're wrong if you're not being facetious then, because people are going to drive cars as long as cars are available, and there's nothing quibbling about it can do about that.

So would you rather that employers pay a significant and fair portion of the profits to the people that generated them or would you rather that employees be grateful that they have a job at all because they're going to make that money and the question is do the workers that generate the money deserve a fair share of it?

If I make my boss $10 million, am I not entitled to $500,000 of that?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Your boss is not entitled to 10 million, so quibbling about a percentage is moot.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

You can't answer a simple question can you

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 1 point 8 months ago

I can answer a simple question, yes. But I can't answer "If I make my boss $10 million, am I not entitled to $500,000 of that?" because it starts with a premise that I reject. Neither "yes" or "no" answers fit - it's like the classic, "have you stopped beating your kids?" question.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent