336
Sony’s TV business is being taken over by TCL (www.theverge.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
132 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 8 months ago (5 children)

When 4k/120 TVs came out, their Bravia was the best midrange you could get. Price doubled to get anything better.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Their early “4k/120s” weren’t even actually 4k/120. Enabling 120hz refresh rates on early Bravias would cut horizontal resolution in half, and then crudely attempt to upscale it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (3 children)

    I mean the true 120hz, not the upscaled crap.

    They came out the same time hdmi got the bandwidth capacity, so before that, it wasn’t even possible.

    I partly use Rtings.com for my info, and they test everything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (2 children)

    No I know what you mean. I’m not talking about the “Trumotion” 120hz motion smoothing technology.

    The first generation of Sony Bravia TVs that advertised native 4k/120hz, specifically to coincide with the release of the PS5, couldn’t actually do native 4k/120hz. It wasn’t until their following generations that were finally able to, in a post-launch firmware update.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    Then you’re misremembering a lot of stuff

    https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/sony/x900h

    This tv came out around the same time as the ps5 (Nov of 2020). A few features came in a later update, but it is 4k/120 out of the box. You couldn’t get a better tv at the time.

    The 800 was never advertised as 120, this is the first model.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    I’m not misremembering anything. I have the x900h in my living room right now. It cannot do native 4k/120hz, to this day. It can do Native 4k OR it can do 120hz but not both. If you enable 120hz, the horizontal resolution is cut in half to only 1080 pixels. This couldn’t be fixed with a driver update because it’s a consequence of Sony cheaping out on the processor. It is physically not capable of it.

    VRR was added in a firmware update, but again due to Sony’s poor choice in hardware components if you enable VRR it disables local dimming entirely. Being an LED panel, without local dimming the picture is significantly degraded. It’s a truly terrible TV for anything but casual Netflix watching, given its price point. If it was half the price they sold it for that’d be a different story.

    At the time, you could have bought a Samsung Q70T instead for the same price which actually had native 4k/120hz.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent