▲ 600 ▼ I survived college without becoming a liberal (thelemmy.club) submitted 7 months ago by cm0002@suppo.fi to c/leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com 87 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 10 points 7 months ago (3 children) Should there not be a fork at this rate? https://piefed.social/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 months ago (2 children) Piefed has a list of words they deem naughty built into the system. Fuck that bullshit. I'm an adult, I don't need some random nanny deciding what is and is not acceptable language for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) It can be and is disabled by other instances. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 months ago (1 child) I'm aware. But if people are going to criticize the Lemmy devs for their ideology which they don't inject into the architecture of their software it seems fair to point out the ideology of the Piefed devs that they do inject into theirs, even if said ideology is less egregious. I don't agree with the Lemmy devs on a lot of things, but I respect their ability to develop without such injections. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Also, the context here is automatic federation of communities - right? It's not a keyword filter in the sense that you're referring to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Still an overreach, imo. Who are they to deem which communities are worthy, especially based on the "appropriateness" of the community name? It's entirely unnecessary, and Piefed would be better off without it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) Having looked at the words and code specifically in reference here, I think it's a copy and paste job from another local function (the local piefed.social retention rules) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) If it's some kind of carryover oversight, that does definitely change the perspective. That said, as it exists today my criticism of nannying remains valid, so now that it's known if it is simple oversight then the devs should absolutely now remove it to the fix the issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago Basically piefed.social scrubs all posts and comments from those exact communities (that fall under those keywords specifically) after 6 months to save on space. Rimu (correctly or incorrectly) regards memeposting as mostly frivolous and not worth saving long-term. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 child) Which word in particular are you inconvenienced by not being able to use? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) Any and all. When I limit my language it is because I have chosen the words to restrict, not because somebody else has. I don't know what your goose image is supposed to suggest, but as an adult I don't need somebody telling me "fuck" is a naughty word. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 child) "Fuck" isn't censored. Which word is limiting your language? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago Look, I don't know what this is, but I have no interest in whatever weird hostile form of communication you think you're having. I'm not an expert in this, but the list I read included any communities with "fuck" in the name. But regardless, as stated, nobody else has the right or authority to deem what is acceptable language, that's a social convention we all get to weigh in on together. But I have no interest in your weird goose-based hostility, so I'm just going to block you now, goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cloudskater@pawb.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) So wait, is this another hub for Lemmy's servers? How is this different then just accessing Lemmy through a third party app? Is this a totally different platform despite accessing the same servers? I'm a bit confused. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Not really - while it is part of the Fediverse, it is not Lemmy. In that sense it's closer to mastodon or pixelfed than a different client, with the key difference being that since the structure/interface are so similar, they're much more easily integrated with each other, so most likely have already interacted with a lost or comment from a Piefed user on a Lemmy community without even noticing :) Different Lemmy clients still connect you to the same servers and accounts, while Piefed's are completely separate - although several Lemmy servers are running their own instance of Piefed too, on a different domain. So, you "access the same servers" in the sense of posts, comments, votes, and potentially server hardware, but not for your account and server software permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cloudskater@pawb.social 1 point 7 months ago Gotcha, I think that makes sense. I don't know much about Piefed, but hey, if it works it works. I prefer Lemmy anyway because it is integrated like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cloudskater@pawb.social 1 point 7 months ago I see, thank you!! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 months ago (2 children) Piefed has a list of words they deem naughty built into the system. Fuck that bullshit. I'm an adult, I don't need some random nanny deciding what is and is not acceptable language for me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) It can be and is disabled by other instances. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 months ago (1 child) I'm aware. But if people are going to criticize the Lemmy devs for their ideology which they don't inject into the architecture of their software it seems fair to point out the ideology of the Piefed devs that they do inject into theirs, even if said ideology is less egregious. I don't agree with the Lemmy devs on a lot of things, but I respect their ability to develop without such injections. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Also, the context here is automatic federation of communities - right? It's not a keyword filter in the sense that you're referring to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Still an overreach, imo. Who are they to deem which communities are worthy, especially based on the "appropriateness" of the community name? It's entirely unnecessary, and Piefed would be better off without it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) Having looked at the words and code specifically in reference here, I think it's a copy and paste job from another local function (the local piefed.social retention rules) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) If it's some kind of carryover oversight, that does definitely change the perspective. That said, as it exists today my criticism of nannying remains valid, so now that it's known if it is simple oversight then the devs should absolutely now remove it to the fix the issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago Basically piefed.social scrubs all posts and comments from those exact communities (that fall under those keywords specifically) after 6 months to save on space. Rimu (correctly or incorrectly) regards memeposting as mostly frivolous and not worth saving long-term. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 child) Which word in particular are you inconvenienced by not being able to use? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) Any and all. When I limit my language it is because I have chosen the words to restrict, not because somebody else has. I don't know what your goose image is supposed to suggest, but as an adult I don't need somebody telling me "fuck" is a naughty word. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 child) "Fuck" isn't censored. Which word is limiting your language? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago Look, I don't know what this is, but I have no interest in whatever weird hostile form of communication you think you're having. I'm not an expert in this, but the list I read included any communities with "fuck" in the name. But regardless, as stated, nobody else has the right or authority to deem what is acceptable language, that's a social convention we all get to weigh in on together. But I have no interest in your weird goose-based hostility, so I'm just going to block you now, goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skavau@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 child) It can be and is disabled by other instances. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 months ago (1 child) I'm aware. But if people are going to criticize the Lemmy devs for their ideology which they don't inject into the architecture of their software it seems fair to point out the ideology of the Piefed devs that they do inject into theirs, even if said ideology is less egregious. I don't agree with the Lemmy devs on a lot of things, but I respect their ability to develop without such injections. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Also, the context here is automatic federation of communities - right? It's not a keyword filter in the sense that you're referring to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Still an overreach, imo. Who are they to deem which communities are worthy, especially based on the "appropriateness" of the community name? It's entirely unnecessary, and Piefed would be better off without it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) Having looked at the words and code specifically in reference here, I think it's a copy and paste job from another local function (the local piefed.social retention rules) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) If it's some kind of carryover oversight, that does definitely change the perspective. That said, as it exists today my criticism of nannying remains valid, so now that it's known if it is simple oversight then the devs should absolutely now remove it to the fix the issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago Basically piefed.social scrubs all posts and comments from those exact communities (that fall under those keywords specifically) after 6 months to save on space. Rimu (correctly or incorrectly) regards memeposting as mostly frivolous and not worth saving long-term. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 9 points 7 months ago (1 child) I'm aware. But if people are going to criticize the Lemmy devs for their ideology which they don't inject into the architecture of their software it seems fair to point out the ideology of the Piefed devs that they do inject into theirs, even if said ideology is less egregious. I don't agree with the Lemmy devs on a lot of things, but I respect their ability to develop without such injections. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Also, the context here is automatic federation of communities - right? It's not a keyword filter in the sense that you're referring to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Still an overreach, imo. Who are they to deem which communities are worthy, especially based on the "appropriateness" of the community name? It's entirely unnecessary, and Piefed would be better off without it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) Having looked at the words and code specifically in reference here, I think it's a copy and paste job from another local function (the local piefed.social retention rules) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) If it's some kind of carryover oversight, that does definitely change the perspective. That said, as it exists today my criticism of nannying remains valid, so now that it's known if it is simple oversight then the devs should absolutely now remove it to the fix the issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago Basically piefed.social scrubs all posts and comments from those exact communities (that fall under those keywords specifically) after 6 months to save on space. Rimu (correctly or incorrectly) regards memeposting as mostly frivolous and not worth saving long-term. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Also, the context here is automatic federation of communities - right? It's not a keyword filter in the sense that you're referring to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Still an overreach, imo. Who are they to deem which communities are worthy, especially based on the "appropriateness" of the community name? It's entirely unnecessary, and Piefed would be better off without it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) Having looked at the words and code specifically in reference here, I think it's a copy and paste job from another local function (the local piefed.social retention rules) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) If it's some kind of carryover oversight, that does definitely change the perspective. That said, as it exists today my criticism of nannying remains valid, so now that it's known if it is simple oversight then the devs should absolutely now remove it to the fix the issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago Basically piefed.social scrubs all posts and comments from those exact communities (that fall under those keywords specifically) after 6 months to save on space. Rimu (correctly or incorrectly) regards memeposting as mostly frivolous and not worth saving long-term. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Still an overreach, imo. Who are they to deem which communities are worthy, especially based on the "appropriateness" of the community name? It's entirely unnecessary, and Piefed would be better off without it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) Having looked at the words and code specifically in reference here, I think it's a copy and paste job from another local function (the local piefed.social retention rules) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) If it's some kind of carryover oversight, that does definitely change the perspective. That said, as it exists today my criticism of nannying remains valid, so now that it's known if it is simple oversight then the devs should absolutely now remove it to the fix the issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago Basically piefed.social scrubs all posts and comments from those exact communities (that fall under those keywords specifically) after 6 months to save on space. Rimu (correctly or incorrectly) regards memeposting as mostly frivolous and not worth saving long-term. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skavau@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) Having looked at the words and code specifically in reference here, I think it's a copy and paste job from another local function (the local piefed.social retention rules) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) If it's some kind of carryover oversight, that does definitely change the perspective. That said, as it exists today my criticism of nannying remains valid, so now that it's known if it is simple oversight then the devs should absolutely now remove it to the fix the issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago Basically piefed.social scrubs all posts and comments from those exact communities (that fall under those keywords specifically) after 6 months to save on space. Rimu (correctly or incorrectly) regards memeposting as mostly frivolous and not worth saving long-term. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) If it's some kind of carryover oversight, that does definitely change the perspective. That said, as it exists today my criticism of nannying remains valid, so now that it's known if it is simple oversight then the devs should absolutely now remove it to the fix the issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago Basically piefed.social scrubs all posts and comments from those exact communities (that fall under those keywords specifically) after 6 months to save on space. Rimu (correctly or incorrectly) regards memeposting as mostly frivolous and not worth saving long-term. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skavau@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago Basically piefed.social scrubs all posts and comments from those exact communities (that fall under those keywords specifically) after 6 months to save on space. Rimu (correctly or incorrectly) regards memeposting as mostly frivolous and not worth saving long-term. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 child) Which word in particular are you inconvenienced by not being able to use? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) Any and all. When I limit my language it is because I have chosen the words to restrict, not because somebody else has. I don't know what your goose image is supposed to suggest, but as an adult I don't need somebody telling me "fuck" is a naughty word. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 child) "Fuck" isn't censored. Which word is limiting your language? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago Look, I don't know what this is, but I have no interest in whatever weird hostile form of communication you think you're having. I'm not an expert in this, but the list I read included any communities with "fuck" in the name. But regardless, as stated, nobody else has the right or authority to deem what is acceptable language, that's a social convention we all get to weigh in on together. But I have no interest in your weird goose-based hostility, so I'm just going to block you now, goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) Any and all. When I limit my language it is because I have chosen the words to restrict, not because somebody else has. I don't know what your goose image is supposed to suggest, but as an adult I don't need somebody telling me "fuck" is a naughty word. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 child) "Fuck" isn't censored. Which word is limiting your language? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago Look, I don't know what this is, but I have no interest in whatever weird hostile form of communication you think you're having. I'm not an expert in this, but the list I read included any communities with "fuck" in the name. But regardless, as stated, nobody else has the right or authority to deem what is acceptable language, that's a social convention we all get to weigh in on together. But I have no interest in your weird goose-based hostility, so I'm just going to block you now, goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 child) "Fuck" isn't censored. Which word is limiting your language? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago Look, I don't know what this is, but I have no interest in whatever weird hostile form of communication you think you're having. I'm not an expert in this, but the list I read included any communities with "fuck" in the name. But regardless, as stated, nobody else has the right or authority to deem what is acceptable language, that's a social convention we all get to weigh in on together. But I have no interest in your weird goose-based hostility, so I'm just going to block you now, goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 1 point 7 months ago Look, I don't know what this is, but I have no interest in whatever weird hostile form of communication you think you're having. I'm not an expert in this, but the list I read included any communities with "fuck" in the name. But regardless, as stated, nobody else has the right or authority to deem what is acceptable language, that's a social convention we all get to weigh in on together. But I have no interest in your weird goose-based hostility, so I'm just going to block you now, goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cloudskater@pawb.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 child) So wait, is this another hub for Lemmy's servers? How is this different then just accessing Lemmy through a third party app? Is this a totally different platform despite accessing the same servers? I'm a bit confused. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Not really - while it is part of the Fediverse, it is not Lemmy. In that sense it's closer to mastodon or pixelfed than a different client, with the key difference being that since the structure/interface are so similar, they're much more easily integrated with each other, so most likely have already interacted with a lost or comment from a Piefed user on a Lemmy community without even noticing :) Different Lemmy clients still connect you to the same servers and accounts, while Piefed's are completely separate - although several Lemmy servers are running their own instance of Piefed too, on a different domain. So, you "access the same servers" in the sense of posts, comments, votes, and potentially server hardware, but not for your account and server software permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cloudskater@pawb.social 1 point 7 months ago Gotcha, I think that makes sense. I don't know much about Piefed, but hey, if it works it works. I prefer Lemmy anyway because it is integrated like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 7 months ago* (1 child) Not really - while it is part of the Fediverse, it is not Lemmy. In that sense it's closer to mastodon or pixelfed than a different client, with the key difference being that since the structure/interface are so similar, they're much more easily integrated with each other, so most likely have already interacted with a lost or comment from a Piefed user on a Lemmy community without even noticing :) Different Lemmy clients still connect you to the same servers and accounts, while Piefed's are completely separate - although several Lemmy servers are running their own instance of Piefed too, on a different domain. So, you "access the same servers" in the sense of posts, comments, votes, and potentially server hardware, but not for your account and server software permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cloudskater@pawb.social 1 point 7 months ago Gotcha, I think that makes sense. I don't know much about Piefed, but hey, if it works it works. I prefer Lemmy anyway because it is integrated like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cloudskater@pawb.social 1 point 7 months ago Gotcha, I think that makes sense. I don't know much about Piefed, but hey, if it works it works. I prefer Lemmy anyway because it is integrated like that. permalink fedilink source parent