▲ 372 ▼ Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 loses Game of the Year from the Indie Game Awards (www.xda-developers.com) submitted 8 months ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 189 comments fedilink hide all child comments Clair Obscur won multiple awards but used generative AI art as placeholders during production. The Indie Game Awards revoked Clair Obscur’s Debut and Game of the Year after the AI disclosure. IGAs reassigned the awards (Blue Prince, Sorry We’re Closed) and reignited debate on gen-AI use.
[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 70 points 8 months ago (5 children) They lied on the application and said no AI was used. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -11 points 8 months ago (4 children) I mean, there was no AI in the finished product. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 27 points 8 months ago (1 child) Read the article: "The Indie Game Awards have a hard stance on the use of gen AI throughout the nomination process and during the ceremony itself. When it was submitted for consideration, a representative of Sandfall Interactive agreed that no gen AI was used in the development of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33." It is wasn't about what was released, the rules of the awards had restrictions on using AI in development and the developers lied about not using it when they submitted themselves for the award. Gen AI is bad, but lying about using it is much worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago GenAI being bad or not is irrelevant for this issue. If they had a rule that you had to wear purple polka dotted pants and they found out you didn’t, they are within their rights to strip the awards. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 8 months ago (1 child) It sounds like you don't agree with the rules as written. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 8 months ago As they should permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -11 points 8 months ago (4 children) I mean, there was no AI in the finished product. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 27 points 8 months ago (1 child) Read the article: "The Indie Game Awards have a hard stance on the use of gen AI throughout the nomination process and during the ceremony itself. When it was submitted for consideration, a representative of Sandfall Interactive agreed that no gen AI was used in the development of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33." It is wasn't about what was released, the rules of the awards had restrictions on using AI in development and the developers lied about not using it when they submitted themselves for the award. Gen AI is bad, but lying about using it is much worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago GenAI being bad or not is irrelevant for this issue. If they had a rule that you had to wear purple polka dotted pants and they found out you didn’t, they are within their rights to strip the awards. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 8 months ago (1 child) It sounds like you don't agree with the rules as written. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 8 months ago As they should permalink fedilink source parent
[–] geekwithsoul@piefed.social 27 points 8 months ago (1 child) Read the article: "The Indie Game Awards have a hard stance on the use of gen AI throughout the nomination process and during the ceremony itself. When it was submitted for consideration, a representative of Sandfall Interactive agreed that no gen AI was used in the development of Clair Obscur: Expedition 33." It is wasn't about what was released, the rules of the awards had restrictions on using AI in development and the developers lied about not using it when they submitted themselves for the award. Gen AI is bad, but lying about using it is much worse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago GenAI being bad or not is irrelevant for this issue. If they had a rule that you had to wear purple polka dotted pants and they found out you didn’t, they are within their rights to strip the awards. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago GenAI being bad or not is irrelevant for this issue. If they had a rule that you had to wear purple polka dotted pants and they found out you didn’t, they are within their rights to strip the awards. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 8 months ago (1 child) It sounds like you don't agree with the rules as written. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 8 months ago As they should permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 8 months ago As they should permalink fedilink source parent