▲ 681 ▼ Denmark wants to ban VPNs to unlock foreign, illegal streams – and experts are worried (www.techradar.com) submitted 8 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 108 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/55094411
[–] gratux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 109 points 8 months ago (3 children) My bet is on a lot of bigtech bribes lobbying permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 8 months ago (2 children) Big Tech has no interest in chat control, though. They vehemently opposed it from the start. How the Danish are acting just doesn't make sense... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mondez@lemdro.id 21 points 8 months ago (1 child) It's more complicated than that as control acts as a barrier to entry preventing competitive start ups entering the market and disrupting it so established players probably don't care as they can bare the cost of compliance if they have to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago* But it would be the other way around: Established players would have to completely break and rewrite their existant transport layer in the whole world, just to be able to also cover the EU. (Or leave.) While potential new competitors would be able to design it to comply right from the start. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 8 months ago (2 children) Big Tech has no interest in chat control, though. They vehemently opposed it from the start. How the Danish are acting just doesn't make sense... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mondez@lemdro.id 21 points 8 months ago (1 child) It's more complicated than that as control acts as a barrier to entry preventing competitive start ups entering the market and disrupting it so established players probably don't care as they can bare the cost of compliance if they have to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago* But it would be the other way around: Established players would have to completely break and rewrite their existant transport layer in the whole world, just to be able to also cover the EU. (Or leave.) While potential new competitors would be able to design it to comply right from the start. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 21 points 8 months ago (1 child) It's more complicated than that as control acts as a barrier to entry preventing competitive start ups entering the market and disrupting it so established players probably don't care as they can bare the cost of compliance if they have to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago* But it would be the other way around: Established players would have to completely break and rewrite their existant transport layer in the whole world, just to be able to also cover the EU. (Or leave.) While potential new competitors would be able to design it to comply right from the start. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago* But it would be the other way around: Established players would have to completely break and rewrite their existant transport layer in the whole world, just to be able to also cover the EU. (Or leave.) While potential new competitors would be able to design it to comply right from the start. permalink fedilink source parent