18
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by can@sh.itjust.works to c/musicproduction@sh.itjust.works

I personally feel that goes against what this community should be about but I'd like feedback, especially on wording.

I don't feel generative "ai" audio is fitting here but a eurorack/modular/generative sequencer type thing would be welcome.

Given a recent post I believe the general community agrees but I need help with wording.

Any thoughts are appreciated.

Edit: not the focus, but I do think stem splitting models are fine, but I would interested in discussion about that too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dojan@pawb.social 8 points 5 months ago

I think there’s a difference between say a sequencer that has a machine learning model behind it, and a model that’s trained on stolen music that takes words as input and outputs slop.

If you look at Synthesizer V for example, the voice providers were compensated and aware of what they are signing up for. The providers in the past back when it was concatenative synthesis who didn’t feel comfortable with a machine learning library, haven’t gotten one (e.g. Cangqiong). It’s also a much smaller company operating on a different scale. You won’t find Kanru Hua or Dreamtonics ~~lobbying the American government~~ bribing the U.S. president so they can be above the law. Sure, nowadays I’m sure they rent a server farm for their training, but I recall Hua training the initial models on his PC in the late 201Xs.

I think for me personally that’s where the sweet spot is, machine learning used to be a helpful tool in a creative process. Whether it replicates a voice, or an instrument, or helps filter noise. It can be done in a manner that doesn’t involve theft or the ruination of communities.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

What do you think of Brian Eno's dabbling in generative music?

[-] Dojan@pawb.social 4 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure who he is or what he uses, so I can't say.

I don't oppose machine learning. It's a tool, and it's quite handy for things. For example, I make ample use of RNNoise If you were to say, record a bunch of samples from an instrument and train a model on that, I don't really see the problem with that.

My problem lies more in the underhanded tactics big corporations are doing right now, stealing masses of data, meddling hard in politics, destroying communities, etc. all for what's ultimately a rather underwhelming and extremely expensive end product no one even asked for.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

You really should look him up. There's a good chance he's had a hand in, work that touched you, or at least inspired it. He pioneered ambient music for example.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

See, this is something I wasn't aware of that further complicates this. I think I see things similarly but that makes it nkneasiwe to define a rule.

[-] Dojan@pawb.social 3 points 5 months ago
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

lmao, sorry, I'm not even sure if I can parse that.

Essentially I really appreciate the input and nuance your comment provided. But despite that I have further difficulty in refining a comprehensive and specific "rule" for the community.

I could just enforce it based on "vibes" but it's my understanding that people don't like that approach to moderation. It may work now but ideally this place will grow and it could easily end up in prompt created audio spam territory.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
18 points (95.0% liked)

Music Production

1163 readers
1 users here now

Please see most recent Meta community post here: On machine learning generative models


Welcome to Music Production@sh.itjust.works.
A place to share anything and everything you want about your music making journey! Learning is the goal, so discussion is encouraged!

Rules are as follows:

  1. Don't share other people's music without commentary, analysis or questions. This is not a music discovery community.
  2. No elitism or bigotry towards other people's music tastes. Be polite in disagreement.

We will update rules as necessary, but I promise we'll stay light on them and only add new ones after discussion!

Here are some useful examples of what a great post would be about:
(in no particular order)

  1. Stuff you made/are making. Get valuable feedback and criticism!
  2. Learning resources - videos, articles, posts on any topic concerning a production process, be it composition, sound design, sampling, mixing, mastering, DAW workflow or any other.
  3. Free plugins, presets and samplepacks. Giveaways and self-made stuff included!
  4. News about production software, releases and personalities.
  5. Questions and general advice about music production.
  6. Essays on your favorite productions. Inspirations and insights!
  7. Your physical analogue gear! Let us know how it performs!

Good to know: As a general word of caution, avoid posting complete compositions, mixes and tracks on the internet before backing them up on a remote and reputable server. Even small snippets or watermarked tracks should be posted AFTER backing it up to cloud. Timestamps from cloud services will help you in case of theft. And, as a public resource, Lemmy (and the broader fediverse) is not a safe place to post your unpublished work, so please make sure your work is protected.


RIP Waveform Social | RIP Lemmy Studio


Be nice. All instance rules apply.


Rules:

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  • No Ads / Spamming.
  • No pornography.

Règles :

  • Soyez respectueux. Tout le monde doit se sentir le bienvenu ici.
  • Pas de bigoterie - y compris le racisme, le sexisme, le capacitisme, l’homophobie, la transphobie ou la xénophobie.
  • Pas de publicités / Pas de spam.
  • Pas de pornographie.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS