Langston Hughes: Lenin (thelemmy.club)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by to c/socialism@lemmygrad.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

Not the photography argument 😭 lmaooooo

Also that says trust in AI, not love of GenAI. AI is going to be very useful in making medical discoveries, helping calculate large datasets, and easing communication breakdown in planned economies, and so on. Not when it comes to making slop “””art”””

I trust AI will be a useful technology; but even in a socialist economy GenAI is still garbage with negative societal worth

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 9 months ago

    Yes, the photography argument that clearly lays out the absurdity of the whole thing. The moral panic you're pursuing is not new, and if you actually bothered to engage in dialectical thinking you'd be able to apply the lessons from photography to the current moment.

    Oh right, AI is going to be useful in all these many areas, just not the one you arbitrarily singled out for no discernible reason. This is precisely the point that many people here have already pointed out to you. What you're doing is claiming that art is some magical feature that is a product of the human soul that cannot be replicated be material means. It's idealism at its finest.

  • source
  • parent