you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'd agree that idealistic (vs "idealism") would be more accurate.

As for the bit on historical progression, it was a simplification. Russia was semi-feudal when it became socialist, China and Vietnam were colonized agrarian countries, Cuba was essentially a plantation, etc. Progression in modes of production isn't so much a strict order but instead a natural progression, and moreover the point is that the driving factor behind their development has been class struggle and evolution in technology changing how we live, produce, and distribute.

  • source
  • parent