▲ 775 ▼ HDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected. (www.heise.de) submitted 10 months ago by VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml 178 comments fedilink hide all child comments I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum's decision that I am missing.
[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (2 children) Isn't aptx only supported on quallcomm chips? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cole@lemdro.id 3 points 10 months ago nope, Pixel supports it for example permalink fedilink source parent [–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago I have done research into what product i should buy three times and i am still not sure enough to answer this. That says enough about how confusing the modern tech market is. They are definitly proprietary and a competitor to LDAC from sony. Finding something that supports both sennheiser and sony headsets without being overpriced is a nightmare. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cole@lemdro.id 3 points 10 months ago nope, Pixel supports it for example permalink fedilink source parent
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago I have done research into what product i should buy three times and i am still not sure enough to answer this. That says enough about how confusing the modern tech market is. They are definitly proprietary and a competitor to LDAC from sony. Finding something that supports both sennheiser and sony headsets without being overpriced is a nightmare. permalink fedilink source parent