▲ 682 ▼ Just vote to change things. (lemmy.ml) submitted 9 months ago by Twongo@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 304 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (3 children) Ugh. I agree with this. But I don't, at the same time. I'm of the opinion that people need to expire. There was a time where we could make the world a better place by working with people, but some just shouldn't exist. Some people just can't be reasoned with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* Both are correct we need a multilateral approach to win this. A peaceful movement is good but it’s a lot stronger if it’s backed by an adjacent movement that has some threat of force. A user above mentioned the civil rights movement with MLK being backed up by the Panthers. This was a great example because if you look at any successful revolution the approach was multilateral. The abolition movement was also multilateral permalink fedilink source parent [+] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago You don't have to be violent to encourage alcoholism or smoking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (3 children) Ugh. I agree with this. But I don't, at the same time. I'm of the opinion that people need to expire. There was a time where we could make the world a better place by working with people, but some just shouldn't exist. Some people just can't be reasoned with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* Both are correct we need a multilateral approach to win this. A peaceful movement is good but it’s a lot stronger if it’s backed by an adjacent movement that has some threat of force. A user above mentioned the civil rights movement with MLK being backed up by the Panthers. This was a great example because if you look at any successful revolution the approach was multilateral. The abolition movement was also multilateral permalink fedilink source parent [+] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago You don't have to be violent to encourage alcoholism or smoking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* Both are correct we need a multilateral approach to win this. A peaceful movement is good but it’s a lot stronger if it’s backed by an adjacent movement that has some threat of force. A user above mentioned the civil rights movement with MLK being backed up by the Panthers. This was a great example because if you look at any successful revolution the approach was multilateral. The abolition movement was also multilateral permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago You don't have to be violent to encourage alcoholism or smoking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago You don't have to be violent to encourage alcoholism or smoking. permalink fedilink source parent