▲ 1050 ▼ Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service (www.theregister.com) submitted 9 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world 140 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] rhubarb@lemmy.world -18 points 9 months ago (2 children) It’s not socialism, it’s welfare. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago (2 children) only if you consider companies as people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rhubarb@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) I’m not agreeing with it but if it were socialism we would at least have public ownership of the bailed out company. Any bailout would just be corporate welfare with little return permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 9 months ago The bailout should transfer ownership to the public. Employees and (sane) products/services can stay, the idiots who tanked the company can shuffle off. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) That's the same with socialism, though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) Socialism would do what's best for society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Socialism would do what the majority of people wanted it to do, it's not a benevolent entity the marches through society and fixes everything. It's merely a tool for society to use to more directly appease the masses needs. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 child) Welfare? For billion dollar companies? That's rich. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rhubarb@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* There’s a ton of precedent. Welfare for the rich is justified all the time while those who truly need it are less and less permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago (2 children) only if you consider companies as people. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rhubarb@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) I’m not agreeing with it but if it were socialism we would at least have public ownership of the bailed out company. Any bailout would just be corporate welfare with little return permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 9 months ago The bailout should transfer ownership to the public. Employees and (sane) products/services can stay, the idiots who tanked the company can shuffle off. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) That's the same with socialism, though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) Socialism would do what's best for society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Socialism would do what the majority of people wanted it to do, it's not a benevolent entity the marches through society and fixes everything. It's merely a tool for society to use to more directly appease the masses needs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rhubarb@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) I’m not agreeing with it but if it were socialism we would at least have public ownership of the bailed out company. Any bailout would just be corporate welfare with little return permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 9 months ago The bailout should transfer ownership to the public. Employees and (sane) products/services can stay, the idiots who tanked the company can shuffle off. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 3 points 9 months ago The bailout should transfer ownership to the public. Employees and (sane) products/services can stay, the idiots who tanked the company can shuffle off. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) That's the same with socialism, though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) Socialism would do what's best for society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Socialism would do what the majority of people wanted it to do, it's not a benevolent entity the marches through society and fixes everything. It's merely a tool for society to use to more directly appease the masses needs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) Socialism would do what's best for society. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Socialism would do what the majority of people wanted it to do, it's not a benevolent entity the marches through society and fixes everything. It's merely a tool for society to use to more directly appease the masses needs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Socialism would do what the majority of people wanted it to do, it's not a benevolent entity the marches through society and fixes everything. It's merely a tool for society to use to more directly appease the masses needs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 child) Welfare? For billion dollar companies? That's rich. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rhubarb@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* There’s a ton of precedent. Welfare for the rich is justified all the time while those who truly need it are less and less permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rhubarb@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* There’s a ton of precedent. Welfare for the rich is justified all the time while those who truly need it are less and less permalink fedilink source parent