you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 10 months ago (5 children)

And as usual everyone is saying NAS, but talking about servers with a built in NAS.

I'm not saying you can't run your services on the same machine as your NAS, I'm just confused why every time there's a conversation about NASs it's always about what software it can run.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    At this point you're just fighting semantics. Even a commercial NAS is reliant on the software too, like with Synology. They run the disk management but also can run Docker and VMs with their built-in hypervisor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The way I see it, a box of drives still needs something to connect it to your network.

    And that something that can only do a basic connection costs only a little less than something that can run a bunch of other stuff too.

    You can see why it all gets bundled together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    For me it's not about what else I can run on it. I want my services separated from my storage devices. If I throw everything into one physical machine it takes everything down if something goes wrong. It's also harder to do upgrades without needing to replace entire machines

  • source
  • parent