Please help keeping these monsters of our streets. It will save lives.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 85 points 9 months ago (28 children)

Besides the obvious fact these trucks are too huge for European roads and parking spaces, America vehicles are simply hot garbage.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (26 children)

    The Japanese and Korean vehicles for the American market aren't any better to be fair.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (25 children)
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I don't think so. Their comment seems over-generalized. Sure, most modern cars are too "sporty" now which translates to being more uncomfortable in my experience. But that doesn't mean I'd lump Japanese cars in the same quality category as American cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (18 children)

    Toyota, particularly, hasn’t kept up with advances in infotainment technology. Their infotainment is literally no better than it was in 08. Honda infotainment is slightly better, but still stuck with terribly low resolution, and only a 9”ish screen. Pretty much any other company will be a better buy than those 2 right now. Remember, the infotainment in every new car is the entire heart of the car, so you’re forced to live with it; you can’t just swap out infotainment screens for something better like you used to be able to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    What options are there that don't have infotainment garbage without buying something that's 10 years old?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    I will not buy a car without a 15” screen. I just cannot read directions as fast on any smaller screen. The bigger the information on the screen, the faster I can read it, and the less precision I need with my gaze.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (8 children)

    Do people actually want infotainment screens?

    The only thing I can think of wanting a screen for is a backup camera. I much prefer buttons when possible. I thought infotainment screens were just a way for manufacturers to save money on buttons. Why would you want one? Is there something I'm missing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    How do you like to get to new places? Turn by turn audio? That mixed with on-screen directions?

    If you like on screen, what is the ideal screen size?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    @brbposting @Taldan Reading a paper map and looking up directions before you drive and then remembering them are critical skills that should be on driving tests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago*

    Makes me feel better doing that!

    Still have to check traffic even for short trips since I refuse to waste half an hour in a jam when looking for green/red roads would’ve taken seconds :) then appreciate traffic notifications along the way

    Admittedly don’t do it with paper but have enjoyed learning roads - even played a game kinda, work to home (San Francisco) where I turned right on red for each red I got, forcing me to explore new places (no GPS)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

    The bigger the screen for me, the safer it is to gaze over at directions. I wouldn’t drive without directions telling me which way is fastest. No way can a human predict traffic better than computers.

    The cameras might not be “required” to drive, but they do increase precision, which in turn is safer overall.

    Also, the last thing I wanna do is know my area super well, then it takes the excitement out of driving around; the engagement is helpful to keep me from being distracted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    If cars were designed so you actually had visibility, you wouldn't Need 500 cameras just to reverse.

    This is why 2000s was peak. You had most creature comforts, and tech wasn't shoved in our faces, and you could actually see out of your car.

    Also, you're driving a boring ass car if you get easily distracted driving. This is what crossovers to do people, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    9 inch infotainment is plenty. The purpose of a car is to travel, not watch SpongeBob Squarepants.

    Infotainment replacements are out there, but often lack support for some specific vehicle options. If the connections were more standardized like the old radios it would certainly be nice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Sorry, I meant that they're all too huge for European roads. Quality wise it varies considerably, Chevy group has kind of stepped it up and honda/the Koreans have slipped (though miles better than Stellantis group with Dodge and jeep still).

  • source
  • parent