you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

Yes! Agreed! Earthbound observatories in second line are in a constant struggle of acquiring proper funding. Which means, that they are operated by people with passion - for the science. The unfortunate side effect is, that everything that isn't operations and academia takes second place again. Employing someone dedicated to just cybersecurity isn't perceived as a priority - after all, 'why would anyone hack an observatory?'

That is the kind of fallacy that can only be avoided if you already had an expert in house, unfortunately. I have been working with researchers, too, and I got the general impression that the appreciation for and crossover of ideas between departments has a lot of room for improvement. So that could also be a factor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I mean. My dream job would be to run infra/ops for a place like this, or really anything at nasa.

    My skill set is generally running infrastructure with the basics of security (I did netsec for a bank for a while).

    But I wouldn’t be able to be paid my salary and benefits, even though I take a much smaller stake than I could working at non profits. It would be even less in these fields.

    Even for a place like nasa the jobs are really hard to come by and the hiring is no where near straightforward. And there’s a lot of regulatory capture that has contractors handling a lot of it with grift and generally poorer benefits as a result.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment