you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 123 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

It was a legitimate protest of a stupid law that uses a legacy of inconsistent thought and limited perception to do an end run around the first amendment, but the text of the law requires a poster per building, so if they have enough in English, there would be no "need" to accept or post them. Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls, I certainly don't see why they couldn't use one of these or to flank the posters they do post with lots of context or more diverse ideas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago*

    Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls

    You don't become a public school middle manager in Texas by showing balls. You'd get weeded out before you even got through the substitute program for teaching gym class.

  • source
  • parent