▲ 1005 ▼ Windows 11 to add an AI agent that runs in background with access to personal folders, warns of security risk (www.windowslatest.com) submitted 10 months ago by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world 176 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] pastelpulse@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago* That's a shame. Hopefully they add lossless someday. permalink fedilink source parent [–] verdi@feddit.org 5 points 10 months ago (1 child) Do this test and come to the dark, white and beak side ;) virustotal URL scan for the link permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 1 point 10 months ago I did the tidal ABX test, which I prefer since it's comparing FLAC, and the difference is almost negligible. I do hear a slight difference >15k, and I can only year up to 18.5k, but on most tracks it's not noticeable. Also slightly worse transients, but again, only noticable on a few tracks. I also can only hear any of this on HD600s with very, very high volume, which is not how I usually listen to music. I really like this test :) Lossless is still nice to have though, mostly because I can then rip FLAC files to do good remasters, which is why I happily use tidal (also for a number of other reasons). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago* That's a shame. Hopefully they add lossless someday. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] verdi@feddit.org 5 points 10 months ago (1 child) Do this test and come to the dark, white and beak side ;) virustotal URL scan for the link permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 1 point 10 months ago I did the tidal ABX test, which I prefer since it's comparing FLAC, and the difference is almost negligible. I do hear a slight difference >15k, and I can only year up to 18.5k, but on most tracks it's not noticeable. Also slightly worse transients, but again, only noticable on a few tracks. I also can only hear any of this on HD600s with very, very high volume, which is not how I usually listen to music. I really like this test :) Lossless is still nice to have though, mostly because I can then rip FLAC files to do good remasters, which is why I happily use tidal (also for a number of other reasons). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 1 point 10 months ago I did the tidal ABX test, which I prefer since it's comparing FLAC, and the difference is almost negligible. I do hear a slight difference >15k, and I can only year up to 18.5k, but on most tracks it's not noticeable. Also slightly worse transients, but again, only noticable on a few tracks. I also can only hear any of this on HD600s with very, very high volume, which is not how I usually listen to music. I really like this test :) Lossless is still nice to have though, mostly because I can then rip FLAC files to do good remasters, which is why I happily use tidal (also for a number of other reasons). permalink fedilink source parent