599
Jack Dorsey Releases Vine Reboot Where AI Content Is Banned (futurism.com)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
134 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Or just had a filter to hide it. I don't feel like banning something from everyone just because I personally don't like it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I think such a filter wouldn't function well enough to keep up, such is the case with search engines which offer the feature, and instead a 0 tolerance ban would be the only effective method.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Zero tolerance ban still requires a method of detecting AI content in order to enforce said ban. Having such detection system in place would then just as well give people the option to choose for themselves whether they want to see such content or not. Ofcourse such filter isn't 100% accurate but neither is a total ban. Some of that content will always get through.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Humans can make reports to contribute to banning accounts and even IPs that prove problematic.

    Humans contributing tags for filters would be like fighting the tide with a spoon.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Humans contributing tags for filters would be like fighting the tide with a spoon.

    Isn't that what you're literally advocating for here? I don't see the practical difference between having users reporting AI content versus users reporting AI content that isn't correctly labeled as such.

    I stand behind what I said. Give people the option to filter it out of their own feeds if they want to. I don't wish to push my own content preferences onto people with different tastes. Curating your own feed is the way to go. Not top down control from the tech companies themselves.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    You don't see a practical difference between tagging an image and removing the source of the images? Really? You can't figure it out when its been spelled out for you? You, specifically you, have a hard time understanding? You're not piecing the mystery together, yet? Your wheels are turning on this colossal conundrum?

    Hey bud, mull it over for a bit and let me know if you figure it out. Smh.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Nor can I figure out this level of unprovoked hostility toward a complete stranger, but looking through your moderation history made it pretty clear that it's not personal but you’re just lashing out to cope with whatever personal issues you’re dealing with. I don't like it but get it. I genuinely hope you find some peace, but I don’t want anything more to do with this, so don’t spend your time writing a response. I've had enough with trying to deal with mean people online.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    personally, I would ban it at the federal level and anytime you use it someone shows up at your house and destroys everything and throws away your computer. and then you go to jail. and then anyone who tries to visit you in jail gets punched in the face. and you have to eat poop in jail

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •