you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

@TehPers @cm0002 I guess I can somewhat empathize with the author. But you're right, the author seems to be frustrated that some things are inherently complex. Though, Rust has terrific documentation and a lot of literature to get enough understanding to where things aren't necessarily runes anymore, but rich in meaning.
I will say though, does nalgebra require custom derive macros? If you need to parse ast on the regular to use a library, I can definitely agree with his point on complexity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    I'm not aware of any custom derives needed to use nalgebra. I've never needed to write any. At most, I've written macro_rules! macros to help with trait impls, but not specifically for nalgebra.

    I'm not too sure what the author is referring to there.

  • source
  • parent