this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025

571 points (99.7% liked)

PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,640 readers

4,892 active

564 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Nintendo’s Monster Capturing Patent Got Rejected by Japan’s Patent Office Due to Lack of Originality (gamesfuze.com)

submitted 11 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

87 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I bet their lawyers have cost more than the whole Palworld production.

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Pokemon, as a franchise, is worth it to monopolize.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Rbnsft@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

If they did something good with it sure.. But they are like Lego.. Not much value for the price compared to others..

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Not sure I can go that far. Lego is vastly superior quality to other blocks. Though they have been heavily reliant on licensed IP over original sets.

parent