▲ 514 ▼ Study Boldly Claims 4K And 8K TVs Aren't Much Better Than HD To Your Eyes, But Is It True? (hothardware.com) submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by artifex@piefed.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 306 comments fedilink hide all child comments A new study published in Nature by University of Cambridge researchers just dropped a pixelated bomb on the entire Ultra-HD market, but as anyone with myopia can tell you, if you take your glasses off, even SD still looks pretty good :)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (3 children) 4k is perfectly fine for like 99% of people. permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 10 months ago* 640K of RAM is all anybody will ever need. 1920x1080 is plenty, if the screen is under 50" and the viewer is more than 10' away and they have 20/20 vision. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 child) 4k is overkill for 99% of people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago Yeah, but you also don't need anything higher than that either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 10 months ago* 640K of RAM is all anybody will ever need. 1920x1080 is plenty, if the screen is under 50" and the viewer is more than 10' away and they have 20/20 vision. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 child) 4k is overkill for 99% of people permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago Yeah, but you also don't need anything higher than that either. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago Yeah, but you also don't need anything higher than that either. permalink fedilink source parent