▲ 1137 ▼ Fictional (feddit.org) submitted 10 months ago by NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 239 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (10 children) Username checks out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -7 points 10 months ago (9 children) Ah yes, disagree with me = Dumb. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Saryn@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (8 children) Well, to be fair, you are talking about "infinite life", and even a collective ("our") infinite life, which unfortunately makes no sense. Mind you, the comment you are replying to, where the universe apparently has agency, is equally as scientifically valid. And to be even more fair - it's in your own username.That said, there's no reason for name calling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -8 points 10 months ago (7 children) Fair enough. It makes more sense if you are a reductionist, and you also deduce that matter coming into being makes no sense, and that it could probably happen the same way again. It also makes no sense that there would be nothing for an infinite amount of time, then the universe just pops into being one day, and we happen to be those lucky few that come to exist by sheer chance. It's more likely that the universe just has boom and bust cycles. Over time, through sheer randomness, it comes into being again. I don't believe there is anything so special about us that can't be recreated by sheer randomness. If we are just patterns, any pattern that can happen, can happen again as well. So there we go. There are a lot of things that aren't clear, like how specific does this pattern have to be (do we have to start with the exact same lives? Or will we be some alien snails with mild sentience). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (3 children) When you say it "makes no sense" or it "makes more sense"... based on what? Because there was a lot of science in the comment above to base things on. But your comment seems more like its based on feels. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -6 points 10 months ago (2 children) Mostly just deduction I suppose. Whatever, if I ever retire, and ever recover, I will finally be able to study these things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) Deduction? Based on what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 10 months ago Ah forget it, I'm too tired for this permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (2 children) It also makes no sense that there would be nothing for an infinite amount of time Time only started existing after the Big Bang. Before that, there was nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -4 points 10 months ago Eh, perhaps. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -7 points 10 months ago (9 children) Ah yes, disagree with me = Dumb. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Saryn@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (8 children) Well, to be fair, you are talking about "infinite life", and even a collective ("our") infinite life, which unfortunately makes no sense. Mind you, the comment you are replying to, where the universe apparently has agency, is equally as scientifically valid. And to be even more fair - it's in your own username.That said, there's no reason for name calling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -8 points 10 months ago (7 children) Fair enough. It makes more sense if you are a reductionist, and you also deduce that matter coming into being makes no sense, and that it could probably happen the same way again. It also makes no sense that there would be nothing for an infinite amount of time, then the universe just pops into being one day, and we happen to be those lucky few that come to exist by sheer chance. It's more likely that the universe just has boom and bust cycles. Over time, through sheer randomness, it comes into being again. I don't believe there is anything so special about us that can't be recreated by sheer randomness. If we are just patterns, any pattern that can happen, can happen again as well. So there we go. There are a lot of things that aren't clear, like how specific does this pattern have to be (do we have to start with the exact same lives? Or will we be some alien snails with mild sentience). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (3 children) When you say it "makes no sense" or it "makes more sense"... based on what? Because there was a lot of science in the comment above to base things on. But your comment seems more like its based on feels. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -6 points 10 months ago (2 children) Mostly just deduction I suppose. Whatever, if I ever retire, and ever recover, I will finally be able to study these things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) Deduction? Based on what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 10 months ago Ah forget it, I'm too tired for this permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (2 children) It also makes no sense that there would be nothing for an infinite amount of time Time only started existing after the Big Bang. Before that, there was nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -4 points 10 months ago Eh, perhaps. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Saryn@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (8 children) Well, to be fair, you are talking about "infinite life", and even a collective ("our") infinite life, which unfortunately makes no sense. Mind you, the comment you are replying to, where the universe apparently has agency, is equally as scientifically valid. And to be even more fair - it's in your own username.That said, there's no reason for name calling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -8 points 10 months ago (7 children) Fair enough. It makes more sense if you are a reductionist, and you also deduce that matter coming into being makes no sense, and that it could probably happen the same way again. It also makes no sense that there would be nothing for an infinite amount of time, then the universe just pops into being one day, and we happen to be those lucky few that come to exist by sheer chance. It's more likely that the universe just has boom and bust cycles. Over time, through sheer randomness, it comes into being again. I don't believe there is anything so special about us that can't be recreated by sheer randomness. If we are just patterns, any pattern that can happen, can happen again as well. So there we go. There are a lot of things that aren't clear, like how specific does this pattern have to be (do we have to start with the exact same lives? Or will we be some alien snails with mild sentience). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (3 children) When you say it "makes no sense" or it "makes more sense"... based on what? Because there was a lot of science in the comment above to base things on. But your comment seems more like its based on feels. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -6 points 10 months ago (2 children) Mostly just deduction I suppose. Whatever, if I ever retire, and ever recover, I will finally be able to study these things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) Deduction? Based on what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 10 months ago Ah forget it, I'm too tired for this permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (2 children) It also makes no sense that there would be nothing for an infinite amount of time Time only started existing after the Big Bang. Before that, there was nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -4 points 10 months ago Eh, perhaps. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -8 points 10 months ago (7 children) Fair enough. It makes more sense if you are a reductionist, and you also deduce that matter coming into being makes no sense, and that it could probably happen the same way again. It also makes no sense that there would be nothing for an infinite amount of time, then the universe just pops into being one day, and we happen to be those lucky few that come to exist by sheer chance. It's more likely that the universe just has boom and bust cycles. Over time, through sheer randomness, it comes into being again. I don't believe there is anything so special about us that can't be recreated by sheer randomness. If we are just patterns, any pattern that can happen, can happen again as well. So there we go. There are a lot of things that aren't clear, like how specific does this pattern have to be (do we have to start with the exact same lives? Or will we be some alien snails with mild sentience). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (3 children) When you say it "makes no sense" or it "makes more sense"... based on what? Because there was a lot of science in the comment above to base things on. But your comment seems more like its based on feels. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -6 points 10 months ago (2 children) Mostly just deduction I suppose. Whatever, if I ever retire, and ever recover, I will finally be able to study these things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) Deduction? Based on what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 10 months ago Ah forget it, I'm too tired for this permalink fedilink source parent [–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (2 children) It also makes no sense that there would be nothing for an infinite amount of time Time only started existing after the Big Bang. Before that, there was nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -4 points 10 months ago Eh, perhaps. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (3 children) When you say it "makes no sense" or it "makes more sense"... based on what? Because there was a lot of science in the comment above to base things on. But your comment seems more like its based on feels. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -6 points 10 months ago (2 children) Mostly just deduction I suppose. Whatever, if I ever retire, and ever recover, I will finally be able to study these things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) Deduction? Based on what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 10 months ago Ah forget it, I'm too tired for this permalink fedilink source parent
[+] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -6 points 10 months ago (2 children) Mostly just deduction I suppose. Whatever, if I ever retire, and ever recover, I will finally be able to study these things. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) Deduction? Based on what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 10 months ago Ah forget it, I'm too tired for this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 child) Deduction? Based on what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 10 months ago Ah forget it, I'm too tired for this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 10 months ago Ah forget it, I'm too tired for this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 6 points 10 months ago (2 children) It also makes no sense that there would be nothing for an infinite amount of time Time only started existing after the Big Bang. Before that, there was nothing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -4 points 10 months ago Eh, perhaps. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -4 points 10 months ago Eh, perhaps. permalink fedilink source parent