270
Aldi just launched its own £16.99 rival to Ring's battery video doorbell – and it's completely subscription-free | TechRadar (www.techradar.com)
submitted 11 months ago by to c/homeassistant@lemmy.world
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Not weird. It's ewaste. 480p in 2025 is trash. Eufy has 2k option for ~$60 on frequent sale with no subscription. So does Reolink.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    So 3 times the cost? It's a fucking doorbell. Does it ding? Camera is a bonus if you want that and 480p is easily enough to see who is there. It's cheap yes, but it's fine.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Aldi doesn't do sales ever.

    480p in 2025 is trash.

    According to who? If it's functional as a doorbell then why does it need to chase higher specs and drive the price up? It's not a movie, and you're pawbably looking at it on a 6 inch screen anyway.

    If you don't like it, don't buy it, spend your money elsewhere. But asserting that no one will use it is ridiculous and more than a little bit privileged.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    You can barely distinguish faces in 480p. It is useless. Technology progressed and there's no reason to continue generating ewaste. These sensors are actual trash. Aldi isn't selling old stock so this literal trash is purposefully manufactured only for people to discover it's not actually useful and immediately return it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Oh no, I can't tell these people's faces apart because someone on the internet said I wouldn't be able too. What am I gonna do??

    (the photo is 480x576 rather than 640x480 or 854x480 (16:9) but you get the idea)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Okay, to be fair to your point, I also think 480p is enough for a doorbell camera, unless you're trying to ID stuff that's far away from your door.

    But also, you can't compare the quality of a still photo with good lightning, and probably some good editing as well, vs a video that mixes in compression artifacts, and also depends on how good the hardware is. That's why 480p videos taken with cameras 15 years ago look much worse than 480p videos taken with phones today.

    Tl;Dr: not all 480p is created equal.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Who is calling this e waste? What are you an AI clanker that needs a higher res to train on? If There is no update to brick the thing in 5 years and it doesnt rely on a non-replaceable battery its not e waste.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent