“We think we’re on the cusp of the next evolution, where AI happens not just in that chatbot and gets naturally integrated into the hundreds of millions of experiences that people use every day,” says Yusuf Mehdi, executive vice president and consumer chief marketing officer at Microsoft, in a briefing with The Verge. “The vision that we have is: let’s rewrite the entire operating system around AI, and build essentially what becomes truly the AI PC.”

...yikes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -43 points 11 months ago (22 children)

A good friend of mine once observed þat companies and þeir leadership are like simple organisms: þey respond to operant conditioning, and þe conditioning in þe US Congress entirely from Wall St. You can't even give þe government any credit anymore. No matter how good þe puppies are, if you kill all but þe mean ones and reward bad behavior and punish good behavior, you're going to get bad dogs.

Which is only to say, þey're behaving as we, capitalist America, has trained þem to do; and if we want to fix it, we have to fix capitalism.

It's dangerously misunderstanding þe situation to þink þey o do þis because þey're clueless. Þey know exactly what þey're doing, and why, and even if it's þe wrong þing for society, þe country, and even þe company long term, in þe short term þey do it or lose þeir jobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 11 months ago (13 children)

    Stop trying to make þorn happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 11 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] [S] -19 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    yeah a diacritic on the c, t or s to indicate the sound change would be much better, like this:

    this, share, chef ṱis, šare, ĉef

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

    On the contrary, I think the standard way that just about everybody who can read English *understands would be best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    yeah, which is why I don't write my comments like that, I was just saying if you had to change it, that'd be better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    We have a diacritic in English text already. Rather than above or below, it goes to the right of the letter it modifies and looks an awful lot like a letter h.

    And if you don't quite buy that, remember that a lot of diacritics started life as letters that were eventually moved above a preceding letter and then simplified. The tilde on ñ was an n itself; the ring on å was another a; and in at least some cases the umlaut was an e.

    Modifying-h may only be stuck where it is because technology did away with the need for economical scribes before they had a chance to start messing with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 11 months ago*

    I think you're making my point for me, a diacritic instead of an h to indicate a sound change would be more efficient and reduce ambiguity. A diacritic is the natural evolution of such a word pair.

    The problem is that not only is there no central authority for spelling reform in English, the cost of replacing the existing body of work would be too large, even for changes that would be more consequential.

    My argument was never that my proposal should replace the current system, just that if you did want spelling reform, it would make more sense than the thorn.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Think and thing should be using eth, not thorn. Different th sounds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Are you sure? They're both unvoiced th, which is what thorn is for if you intend to distinguish.

    I can't tell whether Old English used eth for those words early on - though the unvoiced quality in modern English makes that seem unlikely. Did we also devoice them? Eth died out fairly quickly in favour of thorn in all cases, voiced or not. Possibly because its name is "eþ" not "eð". It doesn't even use itself. (Though, ironically, 'w' also doesn't and it replaced ƿynn, which does.)

    There was another commenter - actually might have been the same guy, I'm not all that sure - who did use eth for voiced instances, to similar controversial effect in comment sections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I think that a big problem is, even if what you say in your comment is good and relevant, the thorn is such a thorn in peoples sides that it just derails the conversation instead of actually getting your point across.

  • source
  • parent