▲ 717 ▼ kurzgesagt – AI Slop Is Killing Our Channel / Destroying the Internet (www.youtube.com) submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Peter_Arbeitslos@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world 216 comments fedilink hide all child comments Maybe not that interesting for everyone here, but I found no better community for this.
[–] Tja@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (3 children) To begin with. Time delta. Cost creep. Anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago it's not that type of channel... they never do more than a percentage or a rate. their thing is to explain concepts in a way a young audience can digest them permalink fedilink source parent [–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Those metrics aren't any more trustworthy than their own subjective word anyway. If they wanted to say they took more time then they could delay at their whim anyway. If they said their production costs increased, then again, they could spend the money to fit the narrative. On those particular points objective evidence is so susceptible to being gamed that it isn't really more valuable than their subjective reporting. Numbers of subscribers/views could be a bit more informative, but then people inclined to disbelieve would claim it's because of any number of other reasons not because of AI slop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tja@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago I'm not accusing them of lying, just being unclear. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago it's not that type of channel... they never do more than a percentage or a rate. their thing is to explain concepts in a way a young audience can digest them permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Those metrics aren't any more trustworthy than their own subjective word anyway. If they wanted to say they took more time then they could delay at their whim anyway. If they said their production costs increased, then again, they could spend the money to fit the narrative. On those particular points objective evidence is so susceptible to being gamed that it isn't really more valuable than their subjective reporting. Numbers of subscribers/views could be a bit more informative, but then people inclined to disbelieve would claim it's because of any number of other reasons not because of AI slop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Tja@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago I'm not accusing them of lying, just being unclear. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 point 1 year ago I'm not accusing them of lying, just being unclear. permalink fedilink source parent