▲ 237 ▼ 'Near Collisions' of Commercial Jets Happen All the Time: FAA Records (gizmodo.com) submitted 3 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 92 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Disgusted_Tadpole@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 years ago (10 children) I didn’t want to know that. permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (8 children) It's not actually true, so don't worry. Edit. If you're going to reply with an "actually" comment, don't. Just go back to Reddit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] meco03211@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (2 children) It is actually true though. Just the FAA's definition of "near collision" is much much looser than what a lay person would think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago Ok permalink fedilink source parent [–] Unsustainable@lemmy.today 1 point 3 years ago I don't know. I've seen some pretty loose lay persons. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago I mean it is true, it's just "near collisions" has a broad definition in terms of air safety. Things that are very low risk or potential problems that were simply resolved before they grew are still recorded. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MarigoldPuppyFlavors@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) "Anyone who points out that I'm wrong needs to leave this place." Such fragility. Yikes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago No. The top comments already explain why the article is wrong. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) He is just worried that HIS "actually" wouldn't stand out as nicely if someone added second one... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago Lol you're the only one that noticed that. Kudos permalink fedilink source parent [–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago The article is clickbait. The margins of range for "near miss" is enormous to ensure such things don't happen. A "near miss" is usually still miles and miles apart, and only registers because two flights may be at the same altitude to avoid weather. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (8 children) It's not actually true, so don't worry. Edit. If you're going to reply with an "actually" comment, don't. Just go back to Reddit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] meco03211@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (2 children) It is actually true though. Just the FAA's definition of "near collision" is much much looser than what a lay person would think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago Ok permalink fedilink source parent [–] Unsustainable@lemmy.today 1 point 3 years ago I don't know. I've seen some pretty loose lay persons. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago I mean it is true, it's just "near collisions" has a broad definition in terms of air safety. Things that are very low risk or potential problems that were simply resolved before they grew are still recorded. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MarigoldPuppyFlavors@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) "Anyone who points out that I'm wrong needs to leave this place." Such fragility. Yikes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago No. The top comments already explain why the article is wrong. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) He is just worried that HIS "actually" wouldn't stand out as nicely if someone added second one... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago Lol you're the only one that noticed that. Kudos permalink fedilink source parent
[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (2 children) It is actually true though. Just the FAA's definition of "near collision" is much much looser than what a lay person would think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago Ok permalink fedilink source parent [–] Unsustainable@lemmy.today 1 point 3 years ago I don't know. I've seen some pretty loose lay persons. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Unsustainable@lemmy.today 1 point 3 years ago I don't know. I've seen some pretty loose lay persons. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago I mean it is true, it's just "near collisions" has a broad definition in terms of air safety. Things that are very low risk or potential problems that were simply resolved before they grew are still recorded. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MarigoldPuppyFlavors@lemmy.world -1 points 3 years ago (3 children) "Anyone who points out that I'm wrong needs to leave this place." Such fragility. Yikes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago No. The top comments already explain why the article is wrong. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) He is just worried that HIS "actually" wouldn't stand out as nicely if someone added second one... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago Lol you're the only one that noticed that. Kudos permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago No. The top comments already explain why the article is wrong. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) He is just worried that HIS "actually" wouldn't stand out as nicely if someone added second one... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago Lol you're the only one that noticed that. Kudos permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago Lol you're the only one that noticed that. Kudos permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago The article is clickbait. The margins of range for "near miss" is enormous to ensure such things don't happen. A "near miss" is usually still miles and miles apart, and only registers because two flights may be at the same altitude to avoid weather. permalink fedilink source parent