Well, opsec can only go so far. At some point you need data packets traveling over real wires, and it's a question of who do you trust with unencrypted data like SMS? Using a data only VPN is "clunky" for wealthy manbabies, who demand less friction in everything they do.

Simply having your data going to their service is immaterial since it's likely the phone number also indicates it's a Cape carrier phone, and the IMEI of the phone doesn't ping for any other carrier.

It's a strong "ugh...maybe, we'll see" from me, but I wouldn't bother with it for another 6 months and see if it ends up one of those super elitist things wealthy people talk about only to each other.

they contracted with the AFP to run the first node of the server and process the data. (Australian law does not provide the same protections as U.S. law for its citizens.)

Thanks for that link. I didn't know that. We are below the US in privacy laws! Is there any first world country worst than Australia?

They said all users were criminals, but who knows what they are calling a crime, specially with the retarded laws down here...

It shows what I suspected, that Australian software and servers must be avoided even more than Americans.

It's a good call to post, but waaay too soon IMO too bother with it. It might simply be flash in the pan marketing for VC funding and not work. It might be a total scam. It might be legit and poorly run. It might be the real deal. It's hard to say without more data.

You should not use a phone with preloaded graphene without first checking the hash. It's also kind of insane to charge $50 for it, when Graphene's web installer just has you click buttons to install. You can even use another phone to do it.