you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 99 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Human CPU originally, but the directors thought people were too stupid to know what that meant at the time (which might have been right, nobody I knew had a computer at that time) and changed the human brain neural network into “you’re all batteries actuallly”

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    That makes way more sense. Whenever I watched it I always thought that there must be way more efficient sources of electricity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    It makes way, way more sense in my opinion.

    Humans are terrible batteries, but the processing power of our brain on the other hand is amazing.

    Based on the FLOPS (Floating point operations per second) today's supercomputer powered by a nuclear power station does not match the processing power of a single brain, powered by a few potatoes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It also makes the plot a bit more meta, where the simulation they're all in is simulated using the brains of the people inside it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    A super computer performs independently of its power source. Power is power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I think the point was more about the quantity of power required to achieve results, rather than the specific sources given. IE: you can run a brain on a few potatoes, but you can't run a super computer on the same due to a lack of sufficient power output.

    Consequently you can't really run a human brain on nuclear power either, though that's probably due to radiation poisoning moreso than a lack of required power generated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What if you use the nuclear plant to power grow lights in a hydroponic potato farm?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I like it, if we can look to harness all of the potatoes processing power, which I'm sure alone is not much (but according to the physics in portal 2, is enough to power a minor AI instance), we can do away with both having to incubate and feed the pesky human processors as well as having to run a matrix at all. I presume a potato is content with its life regardless of manipulation.

    Would've made the films far less interesting though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    Yea, that's akin to a perpetual movement machine : you can't get more out of the system than what you put in ! So the squid's power grid would be in deficit. And they would have to borrow from GERMANY because THEY invested in renewables

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    To be fair, I have no idea what a CPU is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    They could've dumbed down the CPU explanation into something as simple as "the human mind is creative enough to make connections robots can't conceive of, so the machines need us to build new patterns to sustain the matrix" and that would've been enough. At least it wouldn't violate the laws of thermodynamics.

    Also I heard it wasn't the Wachowskis who wanted the change, but they got pressured from some suit who said it was too complicated.

  • source
  • parent