With cigarettes, we recognized the harm that they did and in response developed a series of regulations about where they could be used, who could use them when, how they could be advertised, warning labels that had to be applied, and taxes on them to discourage use and offset the societal harm. As result we get this:

...and this...

The internet is a tricky one on account of it absolutely having crossover with the first amendment, but there's got to be a conversation about its effect on mental health and what if anything can be done in response.

I'm not even sure anymore what this analogy is about but 🤣

exactly, hence why I will always promote research into lung alternatives that can better handle particulate matter and are easily replaceable