▲ 349 ▼ woke rule (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Glitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Not too woke, imo. But too many hugs circles and happy crying at the end of each episode (Disco) permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) disco's problem is that the overarching plot is insane. i'm all for enthusiasm and happiness but when the culmination of an entire season is "a man-baby's crying caused half the galaxy to explode" then my disbelief-suspenders are snapped back on hard enough to leave marks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago It would be an awesome plot for a local anomaly But Galaxy wide was just "nah". Maybe if they let it be some newborn Q or something permalink fedilink source parent [+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) well, sure. but like, the burn was this big mystery plotpoint for sooooo long and then the resolution just stupid. i watched until season four and the long arcs never resolved satisfyingly. it's a bit like lost in that way. which is a shame because the characters and their chemistry kept me watching. except michelle yeoh's character, which i never understood the point of other than to set up the section 31 movie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago maybe i interpreted it wrong then. i think i gave it a fair shake, and i enjoyed each episode in isolation, but the big plotlines didn't click for me. when strange new worlds started i left discovery behind. it's quite obvious where you stand on this, of course, so i think we can leave it at that. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 1 year ago (2 children) disco's problem is that the overarching plot is insane. i'm all for enthusiasm and happiness but when the culmination of an entire season is "a man-baby's crying caused half the galaxy to explode" then my disbelief-suspenders are snapped back on hard enough to leave marks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago It would be an awesome plot for a local anomaly But Galaxy wide was just "nah". Maybe if they let it be some newborn Q or something permalink fedilink source parent [+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) well, sure. but like, the burn was this big mystery plotpoint for sooooo long and then the resolution just stupid. i watched until season four and the long arcs never resolved satisfyingly. it's a bit like lost in that way. which is a shame because the characters and their chemistry kept me watching. except michelle yeoh's character, which i never understood the point of other than to set up the section 31 movie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago maybe i interpreted it wrong then. i think i gave it a fair shake, and i enjoyed each episode in isolation, but the big plotlines didn't click for me. when strange new worlds started i left discovery behind. it's quite obvious where you stand on this, of course, so i think we can leave it at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago It would be an awesome plot for a local anomaly But Galaxy wide was just "nah". Maybe if they let it be some newborn Q or something permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) well, sure. but like, the burn was this big mystery plotpoint for sooooo long and then the resolution just stupid. i watched until season four and the long arcs never resolved satisfyingly. it's a bit like lost in that way. which is a shame because the characters and their chemistry kept me watching. except michelle yeoh's character, which i never understood the point of other than to set up the section 31 movie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago maybe i interpreted it wrong then. i think i gave it a fair shake, and i enjoyed each episode in isolation, but the big plotlines didn't click for me. when strange new worlds started i left discovery behind. it's quite obvious where you stand on this, of course, so i think we can leave it at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) well, sure. but like, the burn was this big mystery plotpoint for sooooo long and then the resolution just stupid. i watched until season four and the long arcs never resolved satisfyingly. it's a bit like lost in that way. which is a shame because the characters and their chemistry kept me watching. except michelle yeoh's character, which i never understood the point of other than to set up the section 31 movie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago maybe i interpreted it wrong then. i think i gave it a fair shake, and i enjoyed each episode in isolation, but the big plotlines didn't click for me. when strange new worlds started i left discovery behind. it's quite obvious where you stand on this, of course, so i think we can leave it at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago maybe i interpreted it wrong then. i think i gave it a fair shake, and i enjoyed each episode in isolation, but the big plotlines didn't click for me. when strange new worlds started i left discovery behind. it's quite obvious where you stand on this, of course, so i think we can leave it at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago maybe i interpreted it wrong then. i think i gave it a fair shake, and i enjoyed each episode in isolation, but the big plotlines didn't click for me. when strange new worlds started i left discovery behind. it's quite obvious where you stand on this, of course, so i think we can leave it at that. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Stamets@lemmy.world [S] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent