So if I understand you correctly, your position is that there are two distinct facets to 'arranging' society

Order (that one person is inherently above or below another, a concept I agree is wrong) and Authority (that being the broad agreement to respect one person's limited and highly contextual "superiority" within a specific area of knowledge).

Extrapolating an example to ensure I understand: this would mean that the legal system is granted the authority to enforce those rules society has agreed on, onto those people we've agreed are subject to it's authority (which is a good way to think about it). And things like conflicting authorities can be handled in the same conceptual 'framework', like how people that respect Anthony Fauci exist at the same time as people who think Anthony Fauci is trying to inject us with ground up infants. Or how there are both authorities that respect LGBTQ+ people's right to exist, and those that want us all rounded up and gassed.

But where I'm stumbling is that you're considering "punching up" or "punching down" as something that can only be done against the Order of society (thus trying to elevate or denegrate someone as inherently above or below another person) and not something that is done against the Authorities in a society. And I can't figure out why that would be the case.

To my eye this fairly explicitly reads as you saying that when (ex:) LGBTQ+ people attempt to "punch up" against the authority figures who want them all gassed, that action is inherently implying that they are attempting to establish themselves as inherently superior to that other person in the Order of all humanity. And I do not think that's what you're trying to say here, since it seems to be completely at odds with every comment you've made on this site in the last two months (and full disclosure I did just go and read all of them)

Is that misrepresenting your position?

(edit: I just wanna throw out that I'm not the one downvoting you)

That's not even a coherent sentence.

Violent and strict feminists are probably feminist if they seek equality. I don't think it's a good position to be in, but that's it

There is a popular trend of "all men", or "the world would be better without men", this is not feminism, and that's the definition of "extreme feminism" for me. Misandry is extreme feminism. These people can go fuck themselves. They're enemies of feminism.

Hating others is easy. There's a lot of xenophoby, homophoby, transphoby, sexism. We don't need more hate from the marginalized people themselves.

I hope what you're saying is not true. I've seen things that make me think it could be, but I still hope must people aren't morons.