you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 year ago* (14 children)

I have a pretty good landlord. This isn't an ACAB situation. The problem is the market, IMO, if not capitalism entirely; even if you got rid of landlords (made it illegal to have tenants), housing prices would still be too high to buy a house. Supply-side or demand-side economics are the only viable solution under capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Yeah, and there will always be a demand for temporary housing. Even if every person has property, tourists need places to stay, you'd need a place to stay if your house is leveled by a natural disaster, it doesn't make sense to jump through all the hoops of property ownership if you just want to be closer to mom's nursing home in her final months, etc.

    The problem isn't filling that need, it's making a profit off it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    under capitalism, almost nothing happens without a profit. If you're so sure the problem isn't capitalism, please explain to me how exactly you're imagining things should work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I don't know how you got 'this person is pro-capitalism' from me saying 'profit is the problem'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I said:

    The problem is the market, IMO, if not capitalism entirely

    but it seemed to me that you were disagreeing with my post when you said "the problem is making a profit off it." I could have misunderstood, and you were agreeing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    ..no, that's just what I said is not the case. You must have misread?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments