Let’s not.

"Let's assume" in this case means "I'll take your word for it because it's really not important to my point."

Firstly, an election is not a single issue referendum and the Conservatives winning an election is therefore not equivalent to the voters agreeing on Brexit.

I would agree in 9 out of 10 cases, this is the tenth. By that time there was already major controversy about possibly canceling Brexit or having a second referendum, the many difficult issues of the separation and the negotiations were obvious and Johnson was specifically pushing for an early election to gain more leverage for his hard-line position. The matter at hand was one that would change Britain's position in the world for a long time, reversing it could not be easily done and it was basically live or death for parts of your economy. This was apparent, as some companies were already in the process of leaving for other EU countries.

All this considered, nobody who wanted the UK to remain could reasonably justify staying home. Remember, I'm not even talking about conservative voters, the issue is 30% not even showing up.

Secondly, in both of these elections the majority of voters voted for anti-Brexit parties.

Yes. "Winner takes all" is fucked up. But that's not my point. 30% stayed home. That's what my first comment was about that you are answering.

so how can I “share the responsibility for decisions that are made in [my] name”, when I did everything in my power to stop it?

See the second to last sentence from my last comment.

not sure why this is in quote marks: they did

Because it's quoting somebody else. Not every quotation mark is insinuating the content isn't true. Politicians lie or only tell certain parts of the truth without context all the time to promote their agenda. It sucks, but none of them have ever been jailed or otherwise punished for it, so as long as that is the case you have to expect it. And it's your job as a citizen to do at least some reading on important issues.

You didn't even have to get the whole picture. You just had to look outside, see the town square that was renovated and freshly paved with EU subsidies (example that my brother in law showed me when we visited - he continued with "they paid for it, now they can gtfo"), or the polish nurse taking care of your grandma 24h, and think for a second. That should have made people doubt.

Also, international news. The internet is a thing, and your mother language happens to be the modern lingua franca.

But by doing so, you’re blaming a lot of innocent people and letting a lot of guilty ones off without scrutiny. You’re literally making it worse.

If you read carefully, you'll notice that not once did I write anything to the effect of what the Tories and UKIP did wasn't bad. All I am saying is that everybody who didn't go out and vote remain had it coming. That includes everybody who didn't vote, and nobody can claim they didn't have access to at least hints about the magnitude of the consequences. The EU publicly told you in advance in pretty simple terms, multiple times. And common sense dictates that no club will ever let you keep the benefits without also sharing the costs (the whole "cherry picking" thing).

You seem unable to differentiate between "Alice did a bad thing" and "Bob is innocent of a different thing" (not the same, not correlated, I said one, not the other). That's sad, but please don't blame me for your false conclusions.