you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 70 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If their energy consumption actually was so small, why are they seeking to use nuclear reactors to power data centres now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Because demand for data centers is rising, with AI as just one of many reasons.

    But that's not as flashy as telling people it takes the energy of a small country to make a picture of a cat.

    Also interesting that we're ignoring something here -- big tech is chasing cheap sources of clean energy. Don't we want cheap, clean energy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Didn’t xitter just install a gas powered data center that’s breaking EPA rules for emissions?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sure we do. Do we want the big tech corporations to hold the reins of that though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    If cheap(er/better) energy is invented then that's good, why would tech corpos be able to "hold the reins" of it exclusively?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Well, patents and what have you are a thing. I’m mostly thinking that I wouldn’t want e.g. Facebook to run any nuclear reactors or energy grids. That’s something I prefer the government does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Nuclear reactors already exist, that's not new tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’m not saying it is. I’m saying that predatory companies shouldn’t run critical infrastructure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Volume of requests and power consumption requirements unrelated to requests made, at least I have to assume. Certainly doesn't help that google has forced me to make a request to their ai every time I run a standard search.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Seriously. I'd be somewhat less concerned about the impact if it was only voluntarily used. Instead, AI is compulsively shoved in every nook and cranny of digital product simply to justify its own existence.

    The power requirement for training is ongoing, since mere days after Sam Altman released a very underehelming GPT-5, he begins hyping up the next one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    And academia will work on that problem. It reminds me of intel processors "projected" to use kilowatts of energy, then smart people made other types of chips and they don't need 2000 watts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That's not small....

    100's of Gigawatts is how much energy that is. Fuel is pretty damn energy dense.

    A Boeing 777 might burn 45k Kg of fuel, at a density of 47Mj/kg. Which comes out to... 600 Megawatts

    Or about 60 houses energy usage for a year in the U.S.


    It's an asinine way to measure it to be fair, not only is it incredibly ambiguous, but almost no one has any reference as to how much energy that actually is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments