you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Here you are acknowledge that ground-based systems are very vulnerable to attack.

Which includes the ground stations that Starlink uses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Still works over Ukraine somehow... Maybe that fancy satellite network just carries it to the next available ground station?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    It works, only if Elon wants it to work. Did you forget he shut it off during the war, several times?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Sure, that's a fault of Elon though, not a fault of satellite networks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    We are talking about Starlink here, correct? Owned by Elon?

    That said, all satellite networks are subject to dying if their ground-stations are taken offline, so if "all the fiber for a country goes down", so does Starlink.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    We are talking about Starlink here, correct? Owned by Elon

    No, we are talking about how hard of a target a satellite based network is vs a terrestrial fiber network. Starlink is being used purely as an example here, but is by no means a complete representation of all aspects of the technology.

    That said, all satellite networks are subject to dying if their ground-stations are taken offline...

    Yes, but they can route traffic between satellites and back down to working ground stations. Theoretically, one working ground station could keep the satellite network connected to the entire Internet. Hence why Starlink still works over Ukraine, and why it is such a big deal when Elon shuts it off.

  • source
  • parent