▲ 778 ▼ Meta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisor (www.thepinknews.com) submitted 1 year ago by compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/technology@lemmy.world 151 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] db2@lemmy.world 111 points 1 year ago (12 children) We're in the dumbest possible timeline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [+] ripcord@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (11 children) We're in the only timeline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (8 children) That doesn't disprove my statement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (7 children) No, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (6 children) Not even a little. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) OK, but it's a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we're trying to pretend it's just some story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes, it doesn't help that it's an incredibly cliche piece of terminology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* We're in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string permalink fedilink source parent [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) If there's only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo permalink fedilink source parent [–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Are you sure? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago As sure as anyone can be. For all purposes as far as affects anyone here, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ripcord@lemmy.world -9 points 1 year ago (11 children) We're in the only timeline. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (8 children) That doesn't disprove my statement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (7 children) No, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (6 children) Not even a little. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) OK, but it's a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we're trying to pretend it's just some story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes, it doesn't help that it's an incredibly cliche piece of terminology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* We're in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string permalink fedilink source parent [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) If there's only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo permalink fedilink source parent [–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Are you sure? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago As sure as anyone can be. For all purposes as far as affects anyone here, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] db2@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (8 children) That doesn't disprove my statement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (7 children) No, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (6 children) Not even a little. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) OK, but it's a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we're trying to pretend it's just some story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes, it doesn't help that it's an incredibly cliche piece of terminology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* We're in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string permalink fedilink source parent [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) If there's only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (7 children) No, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (6 children) Not even a little. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) OK, but it's a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we're trying to pretend it's just some story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes, it doesn't help that it's an incredibly cliche piece of terminology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* We're in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string permalink fedilink source parent [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) If there's only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] db2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (6 children) Not even a little. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) OK, but it's a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we're trying to pretend it's just some story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes, it doesn't help that it's an incredibly cliche piece of terminology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* We're in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string permalink fedilink source parent [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) If there's only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children) OK, but it's a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we're trying to pretend it's just some story. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes, it doesn't help that it's an incredibly cliche piece of terminology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* We're in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes, it doesn't help that it's an incredibly cliche piece of terminology. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* We're in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) That too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* We're in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* We're in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) If there's only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cabillaud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Are you sure? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago As sure as anyone can be. For all purposes as far as affects anyone here, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago As sure as anyone can be. For all purposes as far as affects anyone here, yes. permalink fedilink source parent