▲ 112 ▼ AI industry horrified to face largest copyright class action ever certified (arstechnica.com) submitted 1 year ago by Yuritopiaposadism@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net 56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago (3 children) Petit Bourgeois sentimentality bullshit. Copyright should be destroyed, end of. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I am not pro copyright. I am pro artists being able to live off of doing art. You are a stinky little larper if you cannot see the distinction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago Then what are you arguing for? You're pro artist but not pro copyright, and you express that by defending copyright from the legal battle from AI companies? I also want AI as it exists to die off. Bug I'm asking to strategically support it in it's fight against copyright while pushing for its destruction or cooption for the other, more legitimate reasons to want them gone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago I think the division of labour and the distinction of artist should die and that involves a socialism that involves everyone including what passes for artists these days doing work outside of art as required of them. So that everyone can do art instead of having a privileged few (relative to the global majority) that can while away their time making fan art commisions and shit YouTube videos. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I am not pro copyright. I am pro artists being able to live off of doing art. You are a stinky little larper if you cannot see the distinction. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago Then what are you arguing for? You're pro artist but not pro copyright, and you express that by defending copyright from the legal battle from AI companies? I also want AI as it exists to die off. Bug I'm asking to strategically support it in it's fight against copyright while pushing for its destruction or cooption for the other, more legitimate reasons to want them gone. permalink fedilink source parent [–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago I think the division of labour and the distinction of artist should die and that involves a socialism that involves everyone including what passes for artists these days doing work outside of art as required of them. So that everyone can do art instead of having a privileged few (relative to the global majority) that can while away their time making fan art commisions and shit YouTube videos. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago Then what are you arguing for? You're pro artist but not pro copyright, and you express that by defending copyright from the legal battle from AI companies? I also want AI as it exists to die off. Bug I'm asking to strategically support it in it's fight against copyright while pushing for its destruction or cooption for the other, more legitimate reasons to want them gone. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago I think the division of labour and the distinction of artist should die and that involves a socialism that involves everyone including what passes for artists these days doing work outside of art as required of them. So that everyone can do art instead of having a privileged few (relative to the global majority) that can while away their time making fan art commisions and shit YouTube videos. permalink fedilink source parent