you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Copyright companies losing the case wouldn't make copyright any shorter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Their winning of the case reinforces a harmful precedent.

    At the very least, the claims of those members of the class that are based on >20-year copyrights should be summarily rejected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Copyright owners winning the case maintains the status quo.

    The AI companies winning the case means anything leaked on the internet or even just hosted by a company can be used by anyone, including private photos and communication.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • Copyright owners are then the new AI companies, and compared to now where open source AI is a possibility, it will never be, because only they will have enough content to train models. And without any competition, enshittification will go full speed ahead, meaning the chatbots you don't like will still be there, and now they will try to sell you stuff and you can't even choose a chatbot that doesn't want to upsell you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -4 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [+] -5 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)