115

Qwant and Ecosia debut Staan, a European search index that aims to take on Big Tech (techcrunch.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] extarion@lemmy.zip 58 points 10 months ago

While I'm glad to see Qwant and Ecosia's progress, I have to say a search index "designed specifically for LLMs and generative AI agents" was not quite what I was hoping for when I saw this pop up.

[-] pearcake@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I was also under the impression that they will create proper search engine for regular users, the AI crap is cancer

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I was also under the impression that they will create proper search engine for regular users

It is a proper search engine for regular users

It will power regular search results:

Called European Search Perspective (EUSP), the JV now aims to serve around 50% of French queries and 33% of German queries by the end of the year.

And it also has an API 🫨 that AI search engines can use

[-] extarion@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

It might be a bit naive, but here's to hoping that it's just a stepping stone for a proper alternative search engine.

[-] MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Not naive at all - building the index is the hardest part and once they have that infrastructure, pivoting to consumer search is way more feasable than previous European attempts like Quaero that faild.

[-] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I bet that was the original plan, then they saw that the goal was nowhere near and decided to rebrand a subpar product "for AI".

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How I imagine the conversation went

Qwant, Ecosia:

we want to build an independent web search index that will greatly benefit European people, European economy, European tech industry and breaks the US monopoly on this area

Government official:

I have no idea what you are talking about but here is a 200 page grant request that you can fill up and if it is accepted can maybe get 5000€ in 2 years
We want to build a search index WITH AI !
OO , I'm calling the president ! you'll get billions of €.

[-] noretus@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah I really would prefer we moved away from it... but unfortunately I'm not sure that's possible. EU can't afford to ignore AI either.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 10 points 10 months ago

EU can't afford to ignore AI either.

Can't afford to set fire to large piles of money?

I'm being slightly flippant but I don't really understand what you meant by that.

[-] noretus@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 months ago

EU can't be in a technological disadvantage when it comes to AI. Of course it wants to make it possible for European AI devs to have support, like a search index that also conveniently has the potential of favoring information that aligns with EU interests.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 5 points 10 months ago

EU can't be in a technological disadvantage when it comes to AI.

I think we might be at an impasse as "AI" currently seems to be a solution looking for a problem as far as I can see. Not that LLMs are completely worthless but the "hoover up the internet and hope something useful comes from it" approach seems to be a bit of a technological cul-de-sac that I think the EU would be better off ignoring. Let the other nations spaff money and resources on it, learn from their mistakes, then make a move. We're long past first-mover advantage after all, so we'd only be playing catch-up. Why not just wait a bit and leapfrog?

[-] noretus@sopuli.xyz 3 points 10 months ago

You could be very right but I doubt powers that be want to take that chance. That said, I do consider AI dangerous in the world of information warfare.

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 0 points 10 months ago

Not that LLMs are completely worthless but the “hoover up the internet and hope something useful comes from it”

You're saying that currently AI does not help with anything?

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 10 months ago

I've not found them reliably useful in a personal or professional capacity for anything other than trivial tasks. I've spent a lot of time reviewing code written by LLMs and it was not a good use of my time.

A technology that is inherently unreliable and requires constant supervision needs to be on the level of nuclear fission to be worth the hassle, in my view.

Note that I specifically am talking about "hoover up the internet" LLMs, not specialist tools built on scientific datasets or whatever.

It can summarise my email? Fantastic, except it cannot be relied on to do a good job so I might as well do the reading myself as at least that way the data I'm getting is correct.

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

deleted by creator PIEFED

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sigh, no, I just didn't feel like writing more of an essay. Presume away though because we're done here.

[-] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Do you still see my post? I deleted it 7 hours ago?

edit: why does this lemmy software fuckin suck so much 😡

edit2:

but this worked what

[-] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 10 months ago

search has been using ai under the hood for many years, long before llms came along. that's why google has had so much ai research, even back in like 2012. it's one of the best ways to keep track of that much data.

like it or not the field is very useful, llms are just a rather stupid user-facing part.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 points 10 months ago

Hey if they're actually useful then that's fine! The useful stuff hasn't really been what the AI bros have been pushing in recent years.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 10 months ago

no, that's fair. we usually don't see the useful stuff because it doesn't need hype and just shows up as a data point.

[-] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 10 months ago

And this is why Lemmy is better than Reddit. Not everything has to be a knife fight 😆

[-] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 10 months ago

as long as we're not in a knife fighting kinda community, or i manage to make the mistake of criticising north korea again... then yeah

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025

115 points (100.0% liked)

Buy European

10446 readers

295 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.

Matrix Chat of this community

Rules:

Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.
Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:
Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.
No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.
Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
No generative AI content.

Useful Websites