1630
Spotify fans threaten to return to piracy as music streamer introduces new face-scanning age checks in the UK (www.techradar.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
419 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

It's a load of bullshit, for a start the ISP has my details and should be able to attest my connection is rented by someone of legal age and it should be up to me what I let my children (assuming I have any) see and not see on that connection. I already had to click the "yes just give me the porn damn it" agreement on my mobile phone which was less likely to be randomly shared unmonitored and now this overbearing crap. I'll just avoid sites and services that require this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    I’ll just avoid sites and services that require this.

    It's not the site wanting to do it. It's a requirement from Parliament in the UK.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Safety_Act_2023

    The Online Safety Act 2023[1][2][3] (c. 50) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to regulate online content. It was passed on 26 October 2023 and gives the relevant Secretary of State the power to designate, suppress, and record a wide range of online content that is deemed "illegal" or "harmful to children".[4][5]

    The Act creates a new duty of care for online platforms, requiring them to take action against illegal content, or legal content that could be "harmful" to children where children are likely to access it. Platforms failing this duty would be liable to fines of up to £18 million or 10% of their annual turnover, whichever is higher. It also empowers Ofcom to block access to particular websites. It obliges large social media platforms not to remove, and to preserve access to, journalistic or "democratically important" content such as user comments on political parties and issues.

    I mean, you don't have to go there if you want, but it's probably Parliament you want to be irritated with, not websites following British laws.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent