you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 3 years ago (1 child)

It's the new game all the studios are playing where they remove content they don't deem popular enough to avoid paying any residuals. Zaslav started it with (HBO) Max and now Disney and the others are all following suit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    That's the thing about residuals though. If it's not popular enough you don't have to pay anything. Unless it's a tax thing I can't see a downside to leaving it available.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    Assuming it’s like the others then I believe they will treat it as an investment loss which allows them to take some percentage of the loss as a tax deduction.

    I don’t know how the law works but suspect it makes an eventual return to any form of media unlikely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    This article and other discussions I've seen about this content removal trend seems to put the blame mostly on a tax loophole. I don't really understand it, but what I think is basically happening is the company does a calculation that the show/movie will make them basically no money but taking a loss on it by trashing it will earn them a larger discount on their taxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments