I saw this post titled "Scratch a anti-harm reductionist and a fascist bleeds" (https://lemmy.world/post/33320759)

I commented that "harm reduction" apparently means sending billions in weapons to israel while they commit genocide and shutting down campus protests speaking out against that genocide. I said that seemed pretty fascist to me.

Within an instant, they downvoted my post and banned me. Guess it's my fault for posting in a circlejerk community, but I'm still scratching my head on how that makes me a tankie. Something tells me this mod would be calling in the tanks to suppress any dissent if they could.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Davel, who is an admin, does the exact same and is in this very thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (14 children)

    I can't comment since I haven't seen any bans by him. Not sure how it is relevant here either.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (12 children)

    Ok, clearly not acceptable. But I still don't see much relevance to this thread?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    I'm just making sure you agree that Davels isn't an ideal moderator too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

    I glanced over and I am finding his views much more concerning.

    Still that is really not relevant. I am sure there is plenty of crap moderators out there. I am finding PugJesus particularly bad after revenge ban in unrelated community after an argument in completly different community. He should be removed straight away after that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    I've since removed him, yeah.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Thanks, I believe it was the right decision. Funnily enough, I don't have many issues with PugJesus views at all. It is his moderation which is a problem.

    Pretty much opposite to the other example you gave where I have major issues with this person views. His moderation merely follows this ideological pattern, that's all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Davels does the exact same thing, but much worse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Admittedly, I haven't read all thread you linked but I haven't noticed anything personal in his bans. He seems to follow his ideological line.

    Now, I strongly disagree with his excuses for Russian aggression, denial of attempted genocide of Ukrainians, attempt to whitewash Tienanmen massacre etc. But when he bans/deletes/etc it looks like he does it because he is trying to hide facts inconvenient to the regimes he supports. Not because someone argued with him in a different thread about something completely unrelated.

    In another words, his moderation is completely unsurprising for his dictatorship-supporting instance and a reason I tend to not wander into tankie part of Lemmyverse.

    It appears to be a completely different issue to PugJesus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    But how else could Goat deflect blame?

    Pug is his friend. They must use Whataboutism to deflect blame!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Pug's not my friend, you nincompoop. Nor am I deflecting blame.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments