The Sapienza computer scientists say Wi-Fi signals offer superior surveillance potential compared to cameras because they're not affected by light conditions, can penetrate walls and other obstacles, and they're more privacy-preserving than visual images.

[…] The Rome-based researchers who proposed WhoFi claim their technique makes accurate matches on the public NTU-Fi dataset up to 95.5 percent of the time when the deep neural network uses the transformer encoding architecture.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

We have heard this non-sense before, only to find it's trivially easy to connect to your PID.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Never said that it wasn’t easy, it’s just harder than with facial recognition. In theory you could do it correctly in a way that it isn’t indentifiable.

    Also this works in places where faces are protected

  • source
  • parent