you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

The data ☝️

I'm always surprised by how low the Flatpak share is.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    flapak when i was using it on arch always had issues getting gamescope to run as the flapak version doesn't match the version in steam. with wine adopting support for native Wayland and improvements to Vulcan layers i think flapak version may start to get more popular. but for now the main limiter is, "do i need gamescope to play?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If I'm not mistaken the Gamescope issue in Flatpak is not caused by Arch but the Flatpak itself and how it isolates files, making games escape the Gamescope session

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    yeah the flatpak version of gamescope is the latest version which is meant more to be used in something like lutris or directly with wine. my understanding is a bit hazy on the issue but i think flatpak steam or the Vulcan layers required a specific version or you get something about compatibility and the game would still launch but disable gamescope.

    i think the workaround was to install gamescope through pacman and then configure steam to be able to access it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The sandboxing sometimes breaks applications or requires additional configuration. And I don't like that it's a separate thing I need to maintain, although some package managers pair main package updates etc together.

    And as a NixOS user, I prefer to use nix to handle as much of my system as possible, although flatpak at least is useful as a fallback in a pinch. Of course, this is a niche within a niche and mainstream users, particularly those using immutable distros can and do benefit from flatpak.

  • source
  • parent