▲ 1378 ▼ The turntables (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 180 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (78 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 78 child comments replies: [–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (69 children) If that was the only thing they censored then I don't think as many people would mind permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 69 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (68 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 68 child comments replies: [–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (13 children) You don't think they mind the censorship or what do you mean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments load more comments (12 replies) load more comments (54 replies) [–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (7 children) Should openly fascist people be allowed to vote in your opinion? Just curious what peoples' take on this is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago No, reactionaries should be rehabilitated to the best of society's capabilities. Participation in society isn't sacred, the purpose of democracy is to deliver the best results for the most amount of people. Reactionaries that wish to expel and murder minority groups should be treated as any other violent criminal, through rehabilitation if possible. permalink fedilink source parent [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies) [–] comfy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago Should openly fascist people be allowed to vote [for government] in your opinion? Why should they? As in, materially, how does society benefit from that? How does the democratic decision-making tool become more useful from it? I consider democracy to be a decision-making process, so I don't care for vague idealistic assertions like "every adult should have the right to vote" unless there's a benefit from it. And allowing an explicitly anti-liberal, anti-democratic, bad-faith opportunist (and fascism is explicitly and openly all of those) to vote is harmful to the democratic process and increases the odds of it making a bad decision. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago Openly fascist people should not be allowed to draw breath. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (69 children) If that was the only thing they censored then I don't think as many people would mind permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 69 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (68 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 68 child comments replies: [–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (13 children) You don't think they mind the censorship or what do you mean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments load more comments (12 replies) load more comments (54 replies)
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (68 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 68 child comments replies: [–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (13 children) You don't think they mind the censorship or what do you mean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments load more comments (12 replies) load more comments (54 replies)
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (13 children) You don't think they mind the censorship or what do you mean permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments load more comments (12 replies)
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (7 children) Should openly fascist people be allowed to vote in your opinion? Just curious what peoples' take on this is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago No, reactionaries should be rehabilitated to the best of society's capabilities. Participation in society isn't sacred, the purpose of democracy is to deliver the best results for the most amount of people. Reactionaries that wish to expel and murder minority groups should be treated as any other violent criminal, through rehabilitation if possible. permalink fedilink source parent [+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies) [–] comfy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago Should openly fascist people be allowed to vote [for government] in your opinion? Why should they? As in, materially, how does society benefit from that? How does the democratic decision-making tool become more useful from it? I consider democracy to be a decision-making process, so I don't care for vague idealistic assertions like "every adult should have the right to vote" unless there's a benefit from it. And allowing an explicitly anti-liberal, anti-democratic, bad-faith opportunist (and fascism is explicitly and openly all of those) to vote is harmful to the democratic process and increases the odds of it making a bad decision. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago Openly fascist people should not be allowed to draw breath. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago No, reactionaries should be rehabilitated to the best of society's capabilities. Participation in society isn't sacred, the purpose of democracy is to deliver the best results for the most amount of people. Reactionaries that wish to expel and murder minority groups should be treated as any other violent criminal, through rehabilitation if possible. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments load more comments (3 replies)
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago Should openly fascist people be allowed to vote [for government] in your opinion? Why should they? As in, materially, how does society benefit from that? How does the democratic decision-making tool become more useful from it? I consider democracy to be a decision-making process, so I don't care for vague idealistic assertions like "every adult should have the right to vote" unless there's a benefit from it. And allowing an explicitly anti-liberal, anti-democratic, bad-faith opportunist (and fascism is explicitly and openly all of those) to vote is harmful to the democratic process and increases the odds of it making a bad decision. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago Openly fascist people should not be allowed to draw breath. permalink fedilink source parent