you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 1 year ago (17 children)

i want 90s era icq and 2000s era msn back :(

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    But they both closed source protocols locked down to specific corp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What would you propose, then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    How active are communities on these nowadays?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I think they are OK. When switching to it couple of years ago ifeared there will be no-one but was please tly suprised. For sure you do t have situation where most of the participants in the room are ghost accounts because presence actually works. So might look smaller but you are sure it's real users.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    400/F/krynn oh sorry i was in the red dragon inn room :3

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    XMPP works, but there are no video calls. Matrix has those, and they are very good. But since it is not possible there to see the online state of my friends (turned off everywhere due to horrible performance), it defeats the purpose. I want to see if they are at their computer, not if they own a mobile phone. 😉

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I do 1:1 videocalls on XMPP. Quite some clients implement that now. But there were no videoconferences until very recently. That's changing, though. See Movim right now, for example.

    Main 2 issues with XMPP are inconsistent clients (in terms of GUI but also features wise) and the incredibly, astonishingly, ridiculously sloooooooooooooooow evolution of the protocol through the XSF. Nothing can get in there until it's "perfect". Clients devs are reluctant to implement things until the extension is stable. And the best part is this approach hardly work: the best way to figure if something works is to deploy it in larger and larger scales and improve it on the way as you identify corner cases you didn't think about. Not to review the description for months/year until it qualifies as literature...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Are video calls really that important? I almost never do that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments