you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My friend works for a local town that has a presence on fb, twitter, and inatgarm. The main reason he says they haven't moved to platforms like blsky is because as a government entity they are required to be able to archive all online communications for situations like a Right-to-know request but run into the issue that these small platforms aren't supported by the archiving software so they can't move away completely until then. Fun fact: 1st amendment prevents the government pages from removing or hiding comments you leave on their posta

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Would that stop them from duplicating the information on other platforms?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    It does if it can't be archived, any official posts must be available for a right to know request so they could post on Facebook or twitter but other sites that don't have a way to archive or a third party to archive they can't make official posts

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments