childfree

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Though it does omit the detail about the baby being alone since the death. As written that could refer to just a very unfortunate family where the mother died, and then while the tragedy of the mother's death was fresh the family dealt with a separate tragedy that came close to killing the child.

Including the "alone" is pretty pertinent for the general picture.

And this entire incident is after someone managed to take offense at the concept of a baby "left alone" by a death as somehow accusatory toward the mother, which is far from a concept that I would have read into that headline.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] null@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago*

Remember, the gripe being expressed here is that "left alone" is the action being described. You're claiming that it's hard to include all the same details without including that phrase, so let's really re-write it with the exact same details so you can see how simple it is to just change the action:

A baby was found alone after days in a Phoenix, Arizona, apartment and was rescued by police officers last month after the infants mother had died, officials said Friday.

parent

[–] null@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And all that can be covered in additional phrasing, but still leads with the death of the mother instead of a baby being left alone.

Get it yet?