No, it's not. We can argue whether or not she was really bad, or just not good enough, but the point is, when you have a choice between not perfect (or "bad" for the sake of argument) and objectively awful, and you choose nothing, then you're equally responsible for the current state of things.
There are people suffering and dying now because he's in charge, and let musk take his stupid chainsaw to aid programs. Israel is still doing awful things to the Palestinians, and he did absolutely nothing to help the situation between Ukraine and Russia. He's ramming into every guardrail in our government and breaking through many of them. There will absolutely and 100% be more death and suffering with him as president than if we had gotten Harris. This was obvious well before the election, however the scope and speed are surprising, pretending that abstinence is somehow the morally superior stance is mind boggling.