you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 86 points 3 years ago (8 children)

I, for one, fully support this development.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    While I like the idea of every poacher being neutralised, I also understand that the "poach police" may intentionally/inadvertently kill innocents with their blanket immunity; plus many poachers may be poor af hired-guns that aren't the actual source or root cause for the market, and may not dent the trade at all... Hope I'm wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    I also understand that the “poach police” may intentionally/inadvertently kill innocents with their blanket immunity;

    Is there any evidence that that has been happening? (This article is from 2017, and it mentions "more than 20" poachers being killed in 2015, but doesn't mention any non-poachers being killed, which it seems it would have, given it's talking about the downsides.)

    While I agree that taking the fight to the people financing the poaching, reducing the number of poachers - and providing a very clear disincentive for other "poor af" hired-guns to take up the mantle - could still help.

    Personally, I don't think any implied sanctity of human life extends to people who are killing endangered animals for profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    So just out of curiosity, which one of these crimes voids "sanctity of human life"?

    • Cheating on your taxes
    • Bribing a politician
    • Taking a bribe
    • Kicking a dog
    • Eating a cow
    • Enslaving marginalised minorities for profit
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 3 years ago (3 children)